IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v8y2019i4p34-d294655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Law Address Intersectional Sexual Harassment? The Case of Claimants with Personality Disorders

Author

Listed:
  • Karen O’Connell

    (Faculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia)

Abstract

Sexual harassment across multiple grounds, including race, disability, sexuality and age, remains an entrenched problem that is poorly dealt with in law. Prevalence rates for intersectional sexual harassment are higher for certain groups, while legal redress is low. This paper examines case law on sexual harassment in Australia where there are intersectional factors and asks whether the “intersectionality” section inserted into the federal Sex Discrimination Act in 2011 has impacted legal practice and decision-making. In particular, it considers the situation of sexual harassment claimants with behavioural and personality traits that are considered “disordered” and the specifically gendered disability stereotypes that shape their treatment in law. Recent cases in Australia dealing with the sexual harassment of people with personality disorders show that intersectionality provisions of sexual harassment laws may in fact be used to undermine a legal claim by a person with disability rather than strengthen it. This article argues that an intersectional legal feminist perspective on harassment is needed for the law to work.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen O’Connell, 2019. "Can Law Address Intersectional Sexual Harassment? The Case of Claimants with Personality Disorders," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:8:y:2019:i:4:p:34-:d:294655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/8/4/34/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/8/4/34/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:8:y:2019:i:4:p:34-:d:294655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.