IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v8y2019i3p19-d260607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

End Coercion in Mental Health Services—Toward a System Based on Support Only

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Zinkler

    (Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Kliniken Landkreis Heidenheim gGmbH, Academic Teaching Hospital of Ulm University, Schlosshaustr, 100, 89522 Heidenheim, Germany)

  • Sebastian von Peter

    (Medical School Brandenburg, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Immanuel Albertinen Klinik Rüdersdorf, Seebad 82/83, 15562 Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

Based on the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), several UN bodies, among them the High Commissioner for Human Rights, have argued for a complete ban of all coercive interventions in mental health care. The authors conceptualize a system for mental health care based on support only. Psychiatry loses its function as an agent of social control and follows the will and preferences of those who require support. The authors draw up scenarios for dealing with risk, inpatient care, police custody, and mental illness in prison. With such a shift, mental health services could earn the trust of service users and thereby improve treatment outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Zinkler & Sebastian von Peter, 2019. "End Coercion in Mental Health Services—Toward a System Based on Support Only," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-10, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:19-:d:260607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/8/3/19/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/8/3/19/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Zinkler, 2016. "Germany without Coercive Treatment in Psychiatry—A 15 Month Real World Experience," Laws, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-6, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian von Peter & Martin Zinkler, 2021. "Coping with Criticism and Embracing Change—Further Reflexions on the Debate on a Mental Health Care System without Coercion," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:19-:d:260607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.