IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v7y2018i4p36-d179392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Due Diligence Obligations and Transboundary Environmental Harm: Cybersecurity Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Akiko Takano

    (Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto University; Kyoto 606-8501, Japan)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the due diligence obligations with regard to transboundary harm in international water law and their application to cybersecurity by clarifying the definition of due diligence in light of the procedural duties in recent International Court of Justice (ICJ) cases. The paper explores whether states have responsibilities to prevent transboundary harm caused by nonstate actors. The existing literature on due diligence obligations in international water law and cybersecurity was reviewed, along with ICJ cases relating to procedural duties (international co-operation, environmental impact assessments, and information sharing). The findings confirm that, although procedural duties may be less onerous in cyberspace than in the environment, such duties indeed exist, albeit to a lesser degree. The differences may be accounted for by the fact that customary law related to the environment is already well developed. This study clarifies the concept of due diligence by focusing on procedural duties and examining the definition of due diligence in cyber operations. Due diligence obligations are crucial for states seeking to prevent transboundary harm and are an evolving principle of international law.

Suggested Citation

  • Akiko Takano, 2018. "Due Diligence Obligations and Transboundary Environmental Harm: Cybersecurity Applications," Laws, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:7:y:2018:i:4:p:36-:d:179392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/7/4/36/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/7/4/36/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joyeeta Gupta & Susanne Schmeier, 2020. "Future proofing the principle of no significant harm," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 731-747, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:7:y:2018:i:4:p:36-:d:179392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.