IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v6y2017i4p23-d117250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to Physician Aid in Dying for People with Disabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Alicia Ouellette

    (Albany Law School, Albany, NY 12208, USA)

Abstract

Terminally ill people with disabilities face multiple barriers when seeking physician aid in dying (PAD) in the United States. The first is legality. Efforts to legalize the practice have been thwarted in dozens of states in part due to vocal opposition by advocates for people with disabilities who contend that legalized aid in dying discriminates against and harms people with disabilities by leading to their premature and unnecessary deaths. Some disability rights advocates disagree with their colleagues, however, and support legalization on the ground that it promotes autonomy and independence at the end of life. For proponents, legalization in six states is proving to be an illusive victory. Emerging reports from the states where PAD is legal suggest that people with disabilities may face special and impenetrable barriers when seeking legal aid in dying. This article identifies four such barriers: procedural protections embedded in PAD statutes; physician objection; cost; and a rule pertaining to California veterans. The article calls for additional study to determine the extent to which these barriers have a disparate impact on care options available to terminally-ill people with disabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicia Ouellette, 2017. "Barriers to Physician Aid in Dying for People with Disabilities," Laws, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-9, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:23-:d:117250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/4/23/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/4/23/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:23-:d:117250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.