IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v4y2015i2p164-172d50016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Decision Making Capacity in Older Individuals: Does the Law Give a Clue?

Author

Listed:
  • Marshall B. Kapp

    (Center for Innovative Collaboration in Medicine & Law, Florida State University, College of Medicine and College of Law, 1115 W. Call Street, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4300, USA)

Abstract

Adequate cognitive and emotional capacity is essential to autonomous decision making by adult medical patients. Society often attaches legal consequences to decisional capacity evaluations. Even when the legal system is not formally involved in the competency evaluation of a particular individual, clinical practice and ethical conduct occur within and are informed by legal parameters. Using relevant statutory, court rule, and judicial opinion examples from a representative jurisdiction within the United States, this article argues that the law seldom provides much meaningful guidance to health care and human services providers to assist them regarding the content of capacity evaluation. The article concludes by asking how society ought to respond to the paucity of helpful guidance provided by the law in the decisional capacity evaluation context.

Suggested Citation

  • Marshall B. Kapp, 2015. "Evaluating Decision Making Capacity in Older Individuals: Does the Law Give a Clue?," Laws, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-9, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:164-172:d:50016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/4/2/164/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/4/2/164/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:164-172:d:50016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.