IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v2y2013i2p51-68d24829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sodomy Laws and Gender Variance in Tahiti and Hawai‘i

Author

Listed:
  • Aleardo Zanghellini

    (School of Law, University of Reading, Foxhill House, Whiteknights Road, Earley, Reading, RG67BA, UK)

Abstract

In both Hawaiian and Tahitian, the central meaning of mahu denotes gender-variant individuals, particularly male-bodied persons who have a significant investment in femininity. However, in Hawai‘i, unlike Tahiti, the word mahu is now more commonly used as an insult against gay or transgender people. The negative connotation of the term in Hawaiian indexes lower levels of social acceptability for mahu identity on O‘ahu (Hawai‘i’s most populous island) as compared to Tahiti. The article argues that these differences are partly due to a historical legacy of sexually repressive laws. The article traces the history of sodomy laws in these two Polynesian societies and argues that this history supports the hypothesis that sodomy laws (in conjunction with such social processes as urbanisation and Christianisation) are partially to blame for the diminished social status of mahu on O‘ahu. A different social and legal history in Tahiti accounts for the fact that the loss of social status experienced by Tahitian mahu has been lesser than that of their Hawaiian counterparts.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleardo Zanghellini, 2013. "Sodomy Laws and Gender Variance in Tahiti and Hawai‘i," Laws, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:2:y:2013:i:2:p:51-68:d:24829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/2/2/51/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/2/2/51/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:2:y:2013:i:2:p:51-68:d:24829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.