IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v14y2025i2p13-d1605616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global Compacts and the EU Pact on Asylum and Migration: A Clash Between the Talk and the Walk

Author

Listed:
  • Gamze Ovacık

    (Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada)

  • François Crépeau

    (Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada)

Abstract

The current global mobility paradigm suffers from a great paradox. The illegality of human mobility is manufactured through restrictive migration and asylum policies, which claim to address the supposed challenges of human mobility, such as erosion of border security, burden on the labour market, and social disharmony. On the contrary, they reinforce them, resulting in strengthened anti-migrant sentiments at the domestic level. The contradiction is that the more restrictive migration policies are and the more they are directed at containment of human mobility, the more counterproductive they become. The fact that the policies of the destination states are shaped through the votes of their citizens, and migrants are never part of the conversation which would bring the reality check of their lived lives, is a defining factor that enables state policies preventing and deterring access to territory and containing asylum seekers elsewhere. We demonstrate that this is the dynamic behind the new EU Pact on Migration and Asylum, as it thickens the European borders even further through harsher border procedures and expanded externalisation of migration control. Whereas the Global Compacts represent the paradigm of facilitated mobility and are a significant step in the right direction for moving beyond the defined paradox, the EU Pact represents the containment paradigm and showcases that the tension between the commitments and the actions of states is far from being resolved. Through an assessment of the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum’s alignment with the Global Compacts, this article scrutinizes the trajectory of the global mobility paradigm since the adoption of the Global Compacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Gamze Ovacık & François Crépeau, 2025. "Global Compacts and the EU Pact on Asylum and Migration: A Clash Between the Talk and the Walk," Laws, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:13-:d:1605616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/14/2/13/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/14/2/13/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:13-:d:1605616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.