IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v13y2024i5p60-d1476472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China’s Legal Practices Concerning Challenges of Artificial General Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Bing Chen

    (School of Law, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Jiaying Chen

    (School of Law, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China)

Abstract

The artificial general intelligence (AGI) industry, represented by ChatGPT, has impacted social order during its development, and also brought various risks and challenges, such as ethical concerns in science and technology, attribution of liability, intellectual property monopolies, data security, and algorithm manipulation. The development of AI is currently facing a crisis of trust. Therefore, the governance of the AGI industry must be prioritized, and the opportunity for the implementation of the Interim Administrative Measures for Generative Artificial Intelligence Services should be taken. It is necessary to enhance the norms for the supervision and management of scientific and technological ethics within the framework of the rule of law. Additionally, it is also essential to continuously improve the regulatory system for liability, balance the dual values of fair competition and innovation encouragement, and strengthen data-security protection systems in the field of AI. All of these will enable coordinated governance across multiple domains, stakeholders, systems, and tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Bing Chen & Jiaying Chen, 2024. "China’s Legal Practices Concerning Challenges of Artificial General Intelligence," Laws, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:13:y:2024:i:5:p:60-:d:1476472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/13/5/60/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/13/5/60/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:13:y:2024:i:5:p:60-:d:1476472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.