IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v13y2024i4p45-d1432502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The OECD Dispute Resolution System in Tax Controversies

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Greggi

    (Department of Law, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Anna Miotto

    (Department of Law, University of Bergamo, 24121 Bergamo, Italy)

Abstract

The article analyses the latest international tax law developments in dispute resolution settlement protocols and the need for effective multilateral solutions to prevent international double taxation. While several treaties currently minimise the risks of international double taxation, more must be achieved to provide judicial remedies in cases where two states want to tax the same income simultaneously. The OECD has developed a dispute resolution system based on arbitration clauses to be introduced in conventions signed by the state and a brand-new MLI (multilateral instrument) that should be applicable on a broader scale. These remedies have proven unsatisfactory as the taxpayer is not entitled to play any role in these (arbitration) procedures and cannot stand personally in front of any panel. The authors argue that such a scenario is inconsistent with the rule of law and the due process clauses and should be amended. Creating a supranational court with the entitlement to adjudicate the power to tax would be the optimal solution, but this would collide with the position of several states and their distrust of the international judiciary in tax matters.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Greggi & Anna Miotto, 2024. "The OECD Dispute Resolution System in Tax Controversies," Laws, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:45-:d:1432502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/13/4/45/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/13/4/45/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:45-:d:1432502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.