IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v13y2024i4p43-d1429170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing the Accessibility of Pedestrian Environments: Critical Reflections on the Role of the Public Sector Equality Duty

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Lawson

    (School of Law, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Maria Orchard

    (School of Law, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Ieva Eskyte

    (School of Law, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Morgan Campbell

    (School of Law, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

Abstract

The British Equality Act 2010’s Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) aims to mainstream equality into the decision-making of public authorities. Although it has generated substantial critique, it has been the subject of surprisingly few empirical investigations, and existing literature does not address the role of the PSED in enhancing accessibility—either in the specific context of streetscapes or more generally. Here, we present the findings of a doctrinal and qualitative study on this topic. It consists of a critical review of relevant case law and an empirical study in which we interviewed disability campaigners, lawyers, and people working in or for public authorities. Two broad issues emerged from the empirical investigation: involvement and enforcement—on each of which our interviewees identified a range of concerns. These, together with our critique of case law, inform our analysis of the impact and effectiveness of the PSED in the context of streetscape accessibility, and accessibility more broadly. We conclude that, while the PSED (together with other Equality Act duties) is charged with a critical role in embedding equality—and, therefore, accessibility—in public authority decision-making, various factors have severely hampered its ability to deliver. Accessibility too often appears to be subordinated to other policy agendas instead of being embedded within them. There is an urgent need for reform to ensure that accessibility is suitably prioritised—both generally and in the particular context of streetscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Lawson & Maria Orchard & Ieva Eskyte & Morgan Campbell, 2024. "Enhancing the Accessibility of Pedestrian Environments: Critical Reflections on the Role of the Public Sector Equality Duty," Laws, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-31, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:43-:d:1429170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/13/4/43/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/13/4/43/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:43-:d:1429170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.