IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v12y2023i3p50-d1163821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disability-Specific Sporting Competitions and the UN CRPD: Segregation as Inclusion?

Author

Listed:
  • Rinke Beekman

    (Life Sciences & Technology, Quinz, 1800 Vilvoorde, Belgium
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Frea De Keyzer

    (Institute for Labour Law, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Tim Opgenhaffen

    (Department Private and Economic Law, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
    Institute for Social Law, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Since the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) was created, segregation of persons with disabilities is no longer allowed. Separate schools, sheltered workshops, and isolated social care homes impede inclusion and must be banned. Sport is a remarkable exception to this general principle. The CRPD explicitly states that persons with disabilities should have the opportunity to organize, develop, and participate in disability-specific sporting activities. This contribution—focusing on the Paralympics and Special Olympics—examines why the CRPD allows and encourages disability-specific sporting competitions, despite (or perhaps due to) its radical choice for inclusion. Beyond that, this contribution asks the obvious follow-up question: if disability-specific competitions are allowed, how can the criteria for participation be determined in a manner consistent with the CRPD? The CRPD opposes a medical approach to disability, yet that approach is often used in selection criteria. Although this contribution primarily focuses on sports, the impact is wider: it raises questions on inclusion and how to assess disability.

Suggested Citation

  • Rinke Beekman & Frea De Keyzer & Tim Opgenhaffen, 2023. "Disability-Specific Sporting Competitions and the UN CRPD: Segregation as Inclusion?," Laws, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:50-:d:1163821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/12/3/50/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/12/3/50/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:50-:d:1163821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.