IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v11y2022i2p25-d773918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Locating the Concept of Vulnerability in Canada’s Refugee Policies at Home and Abroad

Author

Listed:
  • Melissa Mary Anderson

    (Graduate Program in Socio-Legal Studies, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada)

  • Dagmar Soennecken

    (School of Public Policy and Administration, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada)

Abstract

How is the concept of “vulnerability” employed in Canadian immigration law? This article presents findings from research conducted as part of the VULNER project (2019–23). We analyze how vulnerability is operationalized in Canada’s inland refugee (or asylum) determination procedures compared to its overseas resettlement program by first discussing some general principles, followed by an examination of the treatment of women and LGBTQI+ individuals seeking protection. We show that legal-bureaucratic logics have constructed two very heterogeneous worlds of vulnerability that may reproduce and exacerbate vulnerabilities rather than create a more inclusive, equitable protection regime in law, policy, and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Melissa Mary Anderson & Dagmar Soennecken, 2022. "Locating the Concept of Vulnerability in Canada’s Refugee Policies at Home and Abroad," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:25-:d:773918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/11/2/25/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/11/2/25/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sasha Baglay & Idil Atak & Varka Kalaydzhieva, 2024. "Understanding Gaps in Supports for Trafficked Migrants in Canada: A Discursive Analysis," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1325-1349, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:25-:d:773918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.