IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v11y2022i2p18-d763100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stolen Wages, Corruption, and Selective Application of the Law: Is APUNCAC a Solution?

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Notley

    (School of Law and Criminology, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia)

  • Bob Hodge

    (Institute of Culture and Society, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia)

Abstract

APUNCAC is a draft international convention designed to address systemic corruption, strengthening UNCAC’s provisions and adding mechanisms to make it more effective. ‘Corruption’ includes public officials abusing their powers. This article addresses an especially insidious form: when laws are created and applied to deny equal protection under the law. Ruling elites control the executive and parliament, to pass laws that selectively target and disadvantage a segment of the population. Our empirical data comes from a historical case, massive government-sanctioned wage theft from Western Australian Aboriginal workers between 1901 and 1972. We use these data to analyse how this kind of corruption works in practice, to evaluate APUNCAC’s measures and strategies, to see what specific measures might be used or modified, and where APUNCAC might need supplementing. We argue that Article 4(3) could have a major impact, especially supported by other Articles and processes, such as dedicated independent courts and strategic engagement with local courts. We evaluate two scenarios: The first scenario is prospective, assuming that APUNCAC is adopted. We evaluate the possible impact of APUNCAC in deterring future corruption involving selective application of the law. The second scenario is retrospective. We evaluate the possible support that APUNCAC might provide regarding court actions that seek redress for potential litigants, such as WA Aboriginal people who were injured in the past.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Notley & Bob Hodge, 2022. "Stolen Wages, Corruption, and Selective Application of the Law: Is APUNCAC a Solution?," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:18-:d:763100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/11/2/18/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/11/2/18/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippa Webb, 2005. "The United Nations Convention Against Corruption," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 191-229, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio Argandoña, 2007. "The United Nations Convention Against Corruption and its Impact on International Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 481-496, September.
    2. David Hess, 2009. "Catalyzing Corporate Commitment to Combating Corruption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(4), pages 781-790, October.
    3. Mikkel Jarle Christensen, 2021. "Legal Mobilization and the Internationalization of Anticorruption Enforcement," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Mahrus Ali & Andi Muliyono & Syarif Nurhidayat, 2023. "The Application of a Human Rights Approach toward Crimes of Corruption: Analyzing Anti-Corruption Regulations and Judicial Decisions," Laws, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Bryane Michael (Linacre College), "undated". "Drafting Implementing Regulations for International Anti-Corruption Conventions," QEH Working Papers qehwps150, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    6. Ana Paula Marques, 2023. "Diversity and uniqueness of Family business in the North of Portugal," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 9, ejis_v9_i.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:18-:d:763100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.