IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v10y2021i4p95-d703185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Restorative Practice in the Criminal Justice System: Examining a Restorative Reasoning Programme in a Women’s Prison

Author

Listed:
  • Ella Rees

    (School of Natural and Social Sciences, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham GL50 2RH, UK)

  • Jonathan Hobson

    (School of Natural and Social Sciences, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham GL50 2RH, UK)

Abstract

This paper is an analysis of a six-week Restorative Reasoning Programme that took place with 13 women in a UK women’s prison. It is an exploratory evaluation based on an adapted version of the QUALIPREV scheme. This two-stage evaluation examines both the processes of the programme, in terms of how well it ran, as well as the outcomes of the programme, in terms of how effective it was in supporting the women to address problem behaviours. Data comprise interviews with the two programme designers and facilitators and with two Prison staff responsible for activities and training; the programme materials used during the scheme; session evaluation forms; and post-programme self-completion reflections from the women engaged in the programme. Overall, the scheme had a range of positive impacts for the women: many expressed a change in attitude, including being more open for discourse and discussion around the harm they may have caused, being more willing to consider the repair needed in their personal relationships, and in some cases seeking subsequent referrals for further restorative work.

Suggested Citation

  • Ella Rees & Jonathan Hobson, 2021. "Restorative Practice in the Criminal Justice System: Examining a Restorative Reasoning Programme in a Women’s Prison," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:95-:d:703185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/10/4/95/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/10/4/95/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Hobson & Brian Payne & Kenneth Lynch & Darren Hyde, 2021. "Restorative Practices in Institutional Settings: The Challenges of Contractualised Support within the Managed Community of Supported Housing," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:95-:d:703185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.