IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v9y2020i2p36-d313138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peacebuilding in Rural Colombia—A Collective Perception of the Integrated Rural Reform (IRR) in the Department of Caquetá (Amazon)

Author

Listed:
  • Maximilian Graser

    (Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF e.V.), Müncheberg 15374, Germany)

  • Michelle Bonatti

    (Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF e.V.), Müncheberg 15374, Germany
    Department of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10099, Germany)

  • Luca Eufemia

    (Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF e.V.), Müncheberg 15374, Germany)

  • Héctor Morales

    (Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF e.V.), Müncheberg 15374, Germany
    Department of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10099, Germany)

  • Marcos Lana

    (Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala 750 07, Sweden)

  • Katharina Löhr

    (Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF e.V.), Müncheberg 15374, Germany
    Department of Urban Plant Ecophysiology, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 14195, Germany)

  • Stefan Sieber

    (Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF e.V.), Müncheberg 15374, Germany
    Department of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10099, Germany)

Abstract

The 2016 peace agreement between the Government of Colombia and the FARC-EP created institutional space for an effective implementation of needed rural reforms. However, the change of power structures also contains risks, like the deterioration of natural resources and the strengthening of other armed groups. By addressing collective perceptions regarding the Integrated Rural Reform (IRR), this paper shows the consequences of the peace agreement for the rural population in the department of Caquetá. Additionally, it presents the main challenges for further departmental development. The case study approach uses both semi-structured expert interviews of rural development stakeholders in different sectors based on three sampling strands, as well as participatory observation in the field. The main findings show an increase of general physical security and (economic) interest in the department since the signing of the agreement, while the deforestation rate, homicides, and threats against social-environmental leaders were all highly increased. The study also derives recommendations of departmental actors in rural development for a more effective peace implementation process, like the change from cattle driven to a more conservational economy with agri-silviculture and ecotourism, led by local civil society. To create a stable peace, it is crucial that the current government effectively implements the IRR, while also considering departmental perceptions of sustainable development. If the implementation process and departmental recognition is not enforced sufficiently, then peace might only be possible at the cost of the Amazon and its nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Maximilian Graser & Michelle Bonatti & Luca Eufemia & Héctor Morales & Marcos Lana & Katharina Löhr & Stefan Sieber, 2020. "Peacebuilding in Rural Colombia—A Collective Perception of the Integrated Rural Reform (IRR) in the Department of Caquetá (Amazon)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:36-:d:313138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/2/36/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/2/36/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberto Junguito & Juan José Perfetti del Corral & Martha Delgado, 2017. "Acuerdo de paz: reforma rural, cultivos ilícitos, comunidades y costo fiscal," Informes de Investigación 15419, Fedesarrollo.
    2. Siri Aas Rustad & Helga Malmin Binningsbø, 2012. "A price worth fighting for? Natural resources and conflict recurrence," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 49(4), pages 531-546, July.
    3. Mónica Hurtado & Catherine Pereira-Villa & Edgar Villa, 2017. "Oil palm development and forced displacement in Colombia: Causal or spurious?," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, vol. 36(71), pages 441-468, July.
    4. Gierhake, Klaus, 2015. "Kommunale Anpassung an den Klimawandel: Quito (Ecuador) aus dem Blickwinkel Governmentalität," Discussion Papers 74, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Center for international Development and Environmental Research (ZEU).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vanegas-Cubillos, M. & Sylvester, J. & Villarino, E. & Pérez-Marulanda, L. & Ganzenmüller, R. & Löhr, K. & Bonatti, M. & Castro-Nunez, A., 2022. "Forest cover changes and public policy: A literature review for post-conflict Colombia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Héctor Morales-Muñoz & Srijna Jha & Michelle Bonatti & Henryk Alff & Sabine Kurtenbach & Stefan Sieber, 2020. "Exploring Connections—Environmental Change, Food Security and Violence as Drivers of Migration—A Critical Review of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-27, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Millán-Quijano, Jaime & Pulgarín, Sebastián, 2023. "Oiling up the field. Forced internal displacement and the expansion of palm oil in Colombia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Issifou, Ismael, 2017. "Can migration reduce civil conflicts as an antidote to rent-seeking?," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 333-353.
    3. Juan José, Perfetti & Leibovich,, José & Delgado, Martha & López, Enrique, 2024. "La tierra para uso agropecuario en Colombia: equidad y productividad," Cuadernos de Fedesarrollo 21192, Fedesarrollo.
    4. Andres Suarez & Paola Andrea Árias-Arévalo & Eliana Martínez-Mera, 2018. "Environmental sustainability in post-conflict countries: insights for rural Colombia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 997-1015, June.
    5. Hurtado-Hurtado, Carolina & Ortiz-Miranda, Dionisio & Arnalte-Alegre, Eladio, 2024. "Disentangling the paths of land grabbing in Colombia: The role of the state and legal mechanisms," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    6. Jiménez Giraldo, Dora Elena & Saldarriaga-Isaza, Adrián & Cicowiez, Martin, 2019. "Distributional and economy-wide effects of post-conflict policy in Colombia," Conference papers 333124, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Camilo Nieto-Matiz, 2023. "Land and State Capacity During Civil Wars: How Land-Based Coalitions Undermine Property Taxation in Colombia," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 67(4), pages 701-727, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:36-:d:313138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.