IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v8y2019i9p142-d268295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Satellite Soil Moisture Products in Mongolia and Their Relation to Grassland Condition

Author

Listed:
  • Oyudari Vova

    (Cartography, GIS and Remote Sensing Department, Institute of Geography, University of Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr Street 5, 37007 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Martin Kappas

    (Cartography, GIS and Remote Sensing Department, Institute of Geography, University of Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr Street 5, 37007 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Ammar Rafiei Emam

    (Cartography, GIS and Remote Sensing Department, Institute of Geography, University of Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr Street 5, 37007 Göttingen, Germany)

Abstract

Monitoring of soil moisture dynamics provides valuable information about grassland degradation, since soil moisture directly affects vegetation cover. While the Mongolian soil moisture monitoring network is limited to the urban and protected natural areas, remote sensing data can be used to determine the soil moisture status elsewhere. In this paper, we determine whether in situ and remotely sensed data in the unaccounted areas of Southwestern Mongolia are consistent with each other, by comparing Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) first passive L-band satellite data with in situ measurements. To evaluate the soil moisture products, we calculated the temporal, seasonal, and monthly average soil moisture content. We corrected the bias of SMOS soil moisture (SM) data using the in situ measured soil moisture with both the simple ratio and gamma methods. We verified the bias-corrected SMOS data with Nash–Sutcliffe method. The comparison results suggest that bias correction (of the simple ratio and gamma methods) enhances the reliability of the SMOS data, resulting in a higher correlation coefficient. We then examined the correlation between SMOS and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) index in the various ecosystems. Analysis of the SMOS and in situ measured soil moisture data revealed that spatial soil moisture distribution matches the rainfall events in Southwestern Mongolia for the period 2010 to 2015. The results illustrate that the bias-corrected, monthly-averaged SMOS data has a high correlation with the monthly-averaged NDVI (R 2 > 0.81). Both NDVI and rainfall can be used as indicators for grassland monitoring in Mongolia. During 2015, we detected decreasing soil moisture in approximately 30% of the forest-steppe and steppe areas. We assume that the current ecosystem of land is changing rapidly from forest to steppe and also from steppe to desert. The rainfall rate is the most critical factor influencing the soil moisture storage capacity in this region. The collected SMOS data reflects in situ conditions, making it an option for grassland studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Oyudari Vova & Martin Kappas & Ammar Rafiei Emam, 2019. "Comparison of Satellite Soil Moisture Products in Mongolia and Their Relation to Grassland Condition," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2019:i:9:p:142-:d:268295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/9/142/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/9/142/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhichao Xue & Martin Kappas & Daniel Wyss, 2021. "Spatio-Temporal Grassland Development in Inner Mongolia after Implementation of the First Comprehensive Nation-Wide Grassland Conservation Program," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2019:i:9:p:142-:d:268295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.