IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v8y2018i1p3-d193830.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Re-Placing the Desert in the Conservation Landscape: Charisma and Absence in the Gobi Desert

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Lezak

    (School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK)

Abstract

Across the Gobi Desert in China and Mongolia, millions of newly planted trees struggle to survive amid adverse ecological conditions. They were planted by a wide variety of actors in an attempt to protect, restore, or modify the local environment, despite evidence of their negative consequences upon local ecosystems. This paper investigates how these afforestation projects both challenge and affirm recent theoretical work on conservation, while also providing key insights into the decision-making framework of land management across the world’s third largest desert region. This analysis, supported by evidence from corporate practice, government policy, and participant observation, builds primarily on the work of Jamie Lorimer and other authors who identify the charisma of certain species as a primary driver of contemporary conservation. But the case of afforestation in the Gobi is inadequately explained by a desire to protect individual species; rather, I show how the charisma at the level of the landscape influences conservation practice. I extend this analysis to suggest that the management of deserts worldwide may be mediated by their perception as absent or empty spaces, thus explaining projects like afforestation which seem to re-place rather than conserve. Using the framework of absence and presence to better understand land use and environmental governance could have implications extending well beyond the Gobi Desert.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Lezak, 2018. "Re-Placing the Desert in the Conservation Landscape: Charisma and Absence in the Gobi Desert," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:3-:d:193830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/1/3/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/1/3/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saito, Osamu, 2009. "Forest history and the Great Divergence: China, Japan, and the West compared," Journal of Global History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 379-404, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tuan-Hwee Sng & Chiaki Moriguchi, 2013. "Taxation and Public Goods Provision in China and Japan before 1850," Global COE Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series gd12-284, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    2. de Jong, Wil & Liu, Jinlong & Youn, Yeo-Chang, 2017. "Land and forests in the Anthropocene: Trends and outlooks in Asia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 17-25.
    3. Tuan-Hwee Sng & Chiaki Moriguchi, 2014. "Asia’s little divergence: state capacity in China and Japan before 1850," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 439-470, December.
    4. Mark Hudson & Junzō Uchiyama & Kati Lindström & Takamune Kawashima & Ian Reader & Tinka Delakorda Kawashima & Danièle Martin & J. Christoper Gillam & Linda Gilaizeau & Ilona R. Bausch & Kara C. Hoover, 2022. "Global processes of anthropogenesis characterise the early Anthropocene in the Japanese Islands," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Yanagisawa, Haruka, 2011. "Village Common Land, Manure, Fodder, and Intensive Agricultural Practices in Tamil Nadu from the Mid-Nineteenth Century," Review of Agrarian Studies, Foundation for Agrarian Studies, vol. 1(1), July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:3-:d:193830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.