IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v2y2013i1p20-36d23012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness of Conservation Reserves: Land Tenure Impacts upon Biodiversity across Extensive Natural Landscapes in the Tropical Savannahs of the Northern Territory, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • John C.Z. Woinarski

    (Department of Land Resource Management, P.O. Box 496, Palmerston, NT 0831, Australia
    The ANU WildCountry Research and Policy Hub, FSES/College of Science, The Australian National University, Building 48, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
    Current Address: North Australian Hub, National Environmental Research Program, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0810, Australia.)

  • Jon Green

    (Department of Land Resource Management, P.O. Box 496, Palmerston, NT 0831, Australia
    Current Address: EBS Ecology, 3/107 Hayward Avenue, Torrensville, SA 5031, Australia.)

  • Alaric Fisher

    (Department of Land Resource Management, P.O. Box 496, Palmerston, NT 0831, Australia)

  • Michelle Ensbey

    (Department of Land Resource Management, P.O. Box 496, Palmerston, NT 0831, Australia
    Current Address: 6 Gray Street, Jingili, NT 0810, Australia.)

  • Brendan Mackey

    (The ANU WildCountry Research and Policy Hub, FSES/College of Science, The Australian National University, Building 48, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
    Current Address: Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia.)

Abstract

This study examines whether there is a biodiversity benefit (“dividend”) associated with the existence and management of conservation reserves in the extensive and largely natural landscape of northern Australia. Species richness and abundance of vertebrate fauna and the intensity of a range of disturbance factors were compared across a set of 967 sampled quadrats, located either in pastoral lands, Indigenous lands or conservation reserves, with all sampled quadrats within a single vegetation type (open forests and savannah woodlands dominated by Eucalyptus miniata and/or E. tetrodonta ). The relationships with land tenure varied between major taxonomic groups, but generally (and particularly for threatened species) values were highest for conservation reserves. This “biodiversity dividend” associated with conservation reserves is considered to be due to the effects of management rather than because conservation reserves were established on lands supporting atypically high conservation values. The impact of weeds and (unsurprisingly) livestock was greatest on pastoral lands, and pig impact was greatest in conservation reserves. Although pastoral and Indigenous lands supported lower biodiversity tallies than reserved lands, the conservation values of reserved lands in this region are probably substantially supported by the maintenance of relatively intact ecological systems across all lands.

Suggested Citation

  • John C.Z. Woinarski & Jon Green & Alaric Fisher & Michelle Ensbey & Brendan Mackey, 2013. "The Effectiveness of Conservation Reserves: Land Tenure Impacts upon Biodiversity across Extensive Natural Landscapes in the Tropical Savannahs of the Northern Territory, Australia," Land, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:2:y:2013:i:1:p:20-36:d:23012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/2/1/20/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/2/1/20/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juliet Katusiime & Brigitta Schütt, 2020. "Linking Land Tenure and Integrated Watershed Management—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, February.
    2. Vanessa M Adams & Robert L Pressey & Natalie Stoeckl, 2014. "Estimating Landholders’ Probability of Participating in a Stewardship Program, and the Implications for Spatial Conservation Priorities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-12, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:2:y:2013:i:1:p:20-36:d:23012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.