IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p878-d1636090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Green Campus Environments in Chinese Universities from Subjective Perceptions: A Textual Semantic and Importance–Performance Analysis Through a Satisfaction Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Lutong Sun

    (School of Architecture and Design, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Rubin Lian

    (Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA)

  • Wei Gao

    (School of Architecture and Design, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Mei Zhao

    (School of Design and Art, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Hui Wang

    (School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

University campuses play a crucial role in sustainable development; however, the current green campus evaluation systems tend to focus primarily on the physical environment and building technology, often overlooking user perception and the impact of these factors on the execution of green campus strategies. Starting with an examination of the connotation and evolution of green campuses, we derived relevant indicators of campus subjective perceptions from both domestic and international green campus evaluation systems. We collected user feedback through satisfaction questionnaires and text data on the green campuses of nine representative Chinese universities. Factor analysis was used to establish the correlations between campus planning and subjective perceptions across six key areas. This research applied importance–performance analysis (IPA) to assess the prioritization of each green campus indicator, integrating it with textual semantic analysis to better understand the perceptions and attitudes of campus users toward green campus development. The findings suggest that the objectives of a green campus cannot be fully achieved using only technical or physical evaluation criteria. Instead, combining subjective feedback with quantitative indicators forms the foundation for effective strategy development. This study also found that users were more concerned about the design of details related to learning, living, entertainment, and recreation than the broader green campus planning decisions made by planners and decision-makers. Focusing on user perception and balancing scientific planning with public participation can help achieve the ultimate goal of green campus planning and design, adhering to a human-centered approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Lutong Sun & Rubin Lian & Wei Gao & Mei Zhao & Hui Wang, 2025. "Evaluating Green Campus Environments in Chinese Universities from Subjective Perceptions: A Textual Semantic and Importance–Performance Analysis Through a Satisfaction Survey," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-30, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:878-:d:1636090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/878/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/878/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:878-:d:1636090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.