Author
Listed:
- Shu Wang
(Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
GIS Technology Engineering Research Centre for West-China Resources and Environment of Educational Ministry, Kunming 650500, China)
- Quanli Xu
(Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
GIS Technology Engineering Research Centre for West-China Resources and Environment of Educational Ministry, Kunming 650500, China)
- Junhua Yi
(Geomatics Engineering Faculty, Kunming Metallurgy College, Kunming 650033, China)
- Qinghong Wang
(School of Economics and Management, Lijiang Culture and Tourism College, Lijiang 674199, China)
- Qihong Ren
(Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
GIS Technology Engineering Research Centre for West-China Resources and Environment of Educational Ministry, Kunming 650500, China)
- Youyou Li
(Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
GIS Technology Engineering Research Centre for West-China Resources and Environment of Educational Ministry, Kunming 650500, China)
- Zhenheng Gao
(Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
GIS Technology Engineering Research Centre for West-China Resources and Environment of Educational Ministry, Kunming 650500, China)
- You Li
(Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
GIS Technology Engineering Research Centre for West-China Resources and Environment of Educational Ministry, Kunming 650500, China)
- Huishan Wu
(Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
GIS Technology Engineering Research Centre for West-China Resources and Environment of Educational Ministry, Kunming 650500, China)
Abstract
Ecological risk evaluation is a prerequisite for the rational allocation of land resources, which is of great significance for safeguarding ecosystem integrity and achieving ecological risk prevention and control. However, existing research lacks analysis of the ecosystem state after land use simulation within the restricted conversion zone, making it impossible to determine whether ecological risks have been mitigated under these constraints. Therefore, we selected the Dianchi basin as the study area, extracted the ecological defense zone as the restricted conversion zone, and used the PLUS (Patch-generating Land Use Simulation) model to simulate land use for 2030 under multiple scenarios. We then evaluated ecological risks based on landscape pattern indices, and analyzed ecological risks under multiple scenarios with and without the restricted conversion zone. By comparing ecological risks across scenarios with and without constraints, we clarified the critical role of ecological risk evaluation in the rational allocation of land resources. The results show the following: (1) The ecological defense zone was obtained by overlaying no-development zones (such as forest parks and nature reserves), areas of extreme importance in the evaluation of water resource protection, soil and water conservation, and biodiversity, as well as areas of extreme importance in the evaluation of soil and water erosion and rocky desertification sensitivity. (2) Cultivated land and woodland cover significant portions of the Dianchi basin. Overall, ecological risk deterioration was more pronounced in the economic scenario (ES), while the ecological scenario (PS) exhibited lower ecological risk compared to the natural scenario (NS). (3) After importing the ecological defense zone into the PLUS model as the restricted conversion zone for land use simulation, ecological risks in all scenarios showed a trend of improvement. The improvement trend was strongest in the NS, followed by the PS, and weakest in the ES. The results of this study can help to identify the most suitable land use planning model and provide a more effective strategy for ecological risk prevention and control.
Suggested Citation
Shu Wang & Quanli Xu & Junhua Yi & Qinghong Wang & Qihong Ren & Youyou Li & Zhenheng Gao & You Li & Huishan Wu, 2025.
"An Ecological Risk Assessment of the Dianchi Basin Based on Multi-Scenario Land Use Change Under the Constraint of an Ecological Defense Zone,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:868-:d:1635329
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:868-:d:1635329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.