IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p852-d1633985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Assessment of Cropland in Typical Grain-Producing Regions Based on Carbon Footprint Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Peipei Pan

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
    Hebei Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Ecological Construction, Shijiazhuang 050024, China)

  • Xiaowen Yuan

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
    Hebei Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Ecological Construction, Shijiazhuang 050024, China)

  • Yanan Jiang

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
    Hebei Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Ecological Construction, Shijiazhuang 050024, China)

  • Yuan Wang

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
    Hebei Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Ecological Construction, Shijiazhuang 050024, China)

  • Xinyun Wang

    (School of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Yongqiang Cao

    (Academy of Eco-Civilization Development for Jing-Jin-Ji Megalopolis, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China)

Abstract

The challenges of limited cropland resources and ecological degradation in grain-producing areas were addressed in this study within the broader context of China’s ecological civilization and dual carbon goals. An integrated framework was employed, applying the three-dimensional ecological footprint (EF 3d ) model, enhanced by carbon footprint improvement, to assess cropland at the provincial, municipal, and county levels. The analysis indicated a rise in both carbon absorption and emissions, resulting in a carbon surplus. Since 1984, chemical fertilizers have been identified as the predominant source of carbon emissions. Carbon absorption was found to vary distinctly among the four crops. Additionally, carbon fluxes displayed notable spatial and temporal variability. The ecological deficit persisted, showing distinct spatial clustering. Moreover, the cropland ecological footprint breadth (EF size ) was found to exhibit a pattern of decrease–increase–decrease, while cropland occupation remained high. The ecological footprint depth (EF depth ) consistently surpassed the threshold of 1. Spatially, the distribution pattern of cropland EF size was opposite to that of EF depth ; the centroid of per capita cropland EF depth underwent a significant spatial shift. The cropland EF 3d was observed to experience a downward trend, with considerable regional disparities. Furthermore, unsustainable use of cropland was observed across multiple scales. This research provides an empirical foundation for promoting advancing ecological agriculture and sustainable cropland use practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Peipei Pan & Xiaowen Yuan & Yanan Jiang & Yuan Wang & Xinyun Wang & Yongqiang Cao, 2025. "Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Assessment of Cropland in Typical Grain-Producing Regions Based on Carbon Footprint Improvement," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-30, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:852-:d:1633985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/852/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/852/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:852-:d:1633985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.