Author
Listed:
- Gorazd Gorup
(Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Žiga Lesar
(Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Matija Marolt
(Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Ciril Bohak
(Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
Abstract
Urban planning has become increasingly complex, necessitating the use of digitized data, large-scale city scans, and advanced tools for planning and development. Recent advancements in open-source 3D modeling software—Blender, have introduced powerful procedural editing tools like geometry nodes alongside robust mesh and curve manipulation capabilities. These features position Blender as a viable and cost-effective alternative to proprietary solutions in urban planning workflows. This study identifies common requirements, tasks, and workflows associated with cityscape transformation and visualization, implementing them within Blender’s environment. Documented working examples are provided, including procedural editing, cloud painting, and mesh transformation operations, demonstrating Blender’s versatility. To evaluate its practicality and performance, we conducted a comparative analysis with the Rhinoceros Grasshopper, a widely used tool in urban planning. Metrics such as computational efficiency, workflow adaptability, and user experience were analyzed across multiple scenarios involving point cloud processing, mesh editing, and visualization tasks. Finally, we suggest further potential improvements aided by Blender’s powerful scripting framework.
Suggested Citation
Gorazd Gorup & Žiga Lesar & Matija Marolt & Ciril Bohak, 2025.
"Procedural Point Cloud and Mesh Editing for Urban Planning Using Blender,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:815-:d:1631293
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:815-:d:1631293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.