Author
Listed:
- Xiaoyang Hu
(Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Zhaofeng Wang
(Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Yili Zhang
(Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Resources and Environment, Beijing 100101, China)
- Dianqing Gong
(Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Linshan Liu
(Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Kewei Li
(Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
Abstract
Functional zoning diversifies the management of grazing intensity within protected areas (PAs). However, the complexity makes it difficult to assess grazing intensity and thus understand the effectiveness of PAs in reducing grazing intensity. In this study, grazing intensity in Madoi County, the Yellow River source region, was evaluated based on mapping gridded livestock in areas where grazing was permitted under management measures in functional zones. The effectiveness of PAs in reducing grazing intensity was then assessed by comparing the changes in grazing intensity in PAs and non-PAs. Furthermore, the contributions of climate change and grazing activity to vegetation changes were quantified using temperature (°C), precipitation (mm), grazing intensity (sheep units/ha), and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) (a proxy of vegetation cover) data. Subsequently, the effects of reducing grazing intensity on vegetation changes were analyzed by comparing the contribution of grazing activity to vegetation changes inside and outside of PAs. The results showed that the average grazing intensity in PAs decreased by 0.23 sheep units/ha, which was higher than the decrease in non-PAs (0.07 sheep units/ha) as expected. Specifically, the average grazing intensity in the core, buffer, and experimental zones decreased by 0.36, 0.22, and 0.14 sheep units/ha, respectively, any of which was a greater reduction than that in non-PAs. The contribution of grazing activity to the increase in vegetation cover in PAs was 12% higher than that outside of PAs, indicating that the positive effect of grazing activity on vegetation changes in PAs was greater than that outside of PAs. The findings suggest that the establishment of PAs in the Yellow River source region are effective in reducing grazing intensity and enhance the positive role of grazing activity in vegetation changes. Our research provides a reference for analyzing the effectiveness of functional zoning in areas with large-scale grazing livestock.
Suggested Citation
Xiaoyang Hu & Zhaofeng Wang & Yili Zhang & Dianqing Gong & Linshan Liu & Kewei Li, 2025.
"Effectiveness of Conservation Measures Based on Assessment of Grazing Intensity in the Yellow River Source Region,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:813-:d:1631313
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:813-:d:1631313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.