IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p802-d1630268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation Analysis of Land Use Change via the PLUS-GMOP Coupling Model

Author

Listed:
  • Ligang Wang

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China
    Ningxia Natural Resources Information Center, Yinchuan 750002, China)

  • Dan Liu

    (Ningxia Natural Resources Information Center, Yinchuan 750002, China)

  • Xinyi Wu

    (Tibet Datang International Upper Nujiang River Hydropower Development Co., Ltd., Lhasa 850001, China)

  • Xiaopu Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Qiaoyang Liu

    (Ningxia Natural Resources Information Center, Yinchuan 750002, China)

  • Weijiang Kong

    (School of Earth Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610097, China)

  • Pingping Luo

    (School of Water and Environment, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China
    Key Laboratory of Subsurface Hydrology and Ecological Effects in Arid Region, Ministry of Education, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Shengfu Yang

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

It is crucial to simulate land use change and assess the corresponding impact on ecosystem services to develop informed land management policies and conservation strategies. To comprehensively simulate the patterns of land use change under different management policies and evaluate the corresponding ecological service values (ESV), a method for coupling the Generalized Multi-Objective Programming (GMOP) model and Patch-generating Land Use Simulation (PLUS) model is proposed in this study. First, the GMOP model is used to obtain optimized land use solutions under different scenarios. Then, the PLUS model is used to analyze the mechanism driving land expansion, explore land conversion patterns, and, ultimately, achieve spatial expression of land use quantity changes. The uncertain parameters in the coupled model are processed by intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. The coupled model successfully integrates the outstanding spatiotemporal dynamic simulation capability of the PLUS model and the multiobjective optimization advantages of the GMOP model, effectively overcoming the limitations of applying a single model in land use analysis. Finally, four different scenarios are established for land use change, namely, business as usual (BAU), economic efficiency priority (RED), ecological protection priority (ELP), and coordinated economic and ecological development (EEB), to predict land use change trends and ecological service values. A case study of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region demonstrates that the area of agricultural land exhibits a stable growth trend in the four different scenarios, with the majority of the expansion occurring through the conversion of grassland. Concurrently, the rate of expansion of construction land is highest in the BAU scenario at 31.72%, compared with the area in 2020. This is notably higher than the rates observed in the RED (10.10%) and EEB (9.47%) cases. With the expansion of construction land, the ESV decreased by 3.485 billion, 1.514 billion, and 1.658 billion yuan in the BAU, RED, and ELP scenarios, representing 41.72%, 24.96%, and 34.05% decreases in ESV, respectively. The proposed integrated methodology accounts for various spatial constraints and land conversion behaviors, thereby ensuring a true and accurate reflection of land use dynamics. This methodology supports the quantification of ESV under different land management strategies, thereby providing policymakers with effective support for data-driven sustainable land use planning and conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ligang Wang & Dan Liu & Xinyi Wu & Xiaopu Zhang & Qiaoyang Liu & Weijiang Kong & Pingping Luo & Shengfu Yang, 2025. "Simulation Analysis of Land Use Change via the PLUS-GMOP Coupling Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:802-:d:1630268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/802/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/802/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:802-:d:1630268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.