Author
Listed:
- Chun-Jing Wang
(Sichuan Academy of Forestry, Chengdu 610081, China
Sichuan Provincial Forestry and Grassland Key Laboratory of Combating Desertilicatlon, Chengdu 610081, China)
- Dong-Zhou Deng
(Sichuan Academy of Forestry, Chengdu 610081, China
Sichuan Provincial Forestry and Grassland Key Laboratory of Combating Desertilicatlon, Chengdu 610081, China)
- Wu-Xian Yan
(Sichuan Academy of Forestry, Chengdu 610081, China
Sichuan Provincial Forestry and Grassland Key Laboratory of Combating Desertilicatlon, Chengdu 610081, China)
- Zhi-Wen Gao
(Climate Bridge Ltd. (Shanghai), Shanghai 200120, China)
- Shan-Feng Huang
(Climate Bridge Ltd. (Shanghai), Shanghai 200120, China)
- Ji-Zhong Wan
(Key Laboratory of Mountain Surface Processes and Ecological Regulation, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610299, China)
Abstract
The development of carbon sequestration projects in plantation forests has the potential to offer win–win outcomes for the environment and economy. The Climate, Community, and Biodiversity (CCB) Standards ensure that a particular forest project will deliver tangible climate, community, and biodiversity benefits. According to the CCB Standards, it is necessary to assess community diversity in plantation forests. Our study provides indicators of community diversity based on Forest Integrity Assessment (FIA) according to the CCB Standards for carbon sequestration projects in Tianshui City, Gansu Province, China, which is located in the western Qinba Mountains. Herein, we estimated plantation forest conditions based on a forest condition assessment. Linear regression models were used to explore the relationships between FIA scores and community diversity (such as species richness, Shannon–Wiener index, inverse Simpson’s index, and Pielou’s evenness index quantified by species abundance) in plantation forests managed under carbon sequestration projects. The high community diversity reaches the CCB Standards. FIA scores were closely associated with Pielou’s evenness index of plant communities in plantation forests managed under carbon sequestration projects (R 2 = 0.104; mean square error = 0.014; standard error = 0.104; p = 0.012). A complex topography had positive effects on species richness, while a rich standing condition had negative effects on the Shannon–Wiener index. Forest conditions have been used as indicators of community diversity in plantation forests managed under carbon sequestration projects. The occurrence of climber and animal species should be used as indicators for enhancing community diversity to meet the CCB Standards. Furthermore, plant species richness benefits from a complex topography. However, our study had the limitation that the FIA could not cover the full range of environmental conditions. Our study provides a practical reference for applying the CCB Standards to plantation forests managed under carbon sequestration projects.
Suggested Citation
Chun-Jing Wang & Dong-Zhou Deng & Wu-Xian Yan & Zhi-Wen Gao & Shan-Feng Huang & Ji-Zhong Wan, 2025.
"Application of Forest Integrity Assessment to Determine Community Diversity in Plantation Forests Managed Under Carbon Sequestration Projects in the Western Qinba Mountains, China,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:798-:d:1629889
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:798-:d:1629889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.