Author
Listed:
- Pengyu Zhao
(College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)
- Jiale An
(College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)
- Jianghua Zheng
(College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)
- Wanqiang Han
(College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)
- Nigela Tuerxun
(College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)
- Bochao Cui
(Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China)
- Xuemi Zhao
(Changji Geological Brigade, Geological Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Changji 831100, China)
Abstract
Dunes are key geomorphological features in aeolian environments, and their automated mapping is essential for ecological management and sandstorm disaster early warning in desert regions. However, the diversity and complexity of the dune morphology present significant challenges when using traditional classification methods, particularly in feature extraction, model parameter optimization, and large-scale mapping. This study focuses on the Gurbantünggüt Desert in China, utilizing the Google Earth Engine (GEE) cloud platform alongside multi-source remote sensing data from Landsat-8 (30 m) and Sentinel-2 (10 m). By integrating three deep learning models—DeepLab v3, U-Net, and U-Net++—this research evaluates the impact of the batch size, image resolution, and model structure on the dune segmentation performance, ultimately producing a high-precision dune type map. The results indicate that (1) the batch size significantly affects model optimization. Increasing the batch size from 4 to 12 improves the overall accuracy (OA) from 69.65% to 84.34% for Landsat-8 and from 89.19% to 92.03% for Sentinel-2. Increasing the batch size further to 16 results in a slower OA improvement, with Landsat-8 reaching OA of 86.63% and Sentinel-2 reaching OA of 92.32%, suggesting that gradient optimization approaches saturation. (2) The higher resolution of Sentinel-2 greatly enhances the ability to capture finer details, with the segmentation accuracy (OA: 92.45%) being 5.82% higher than that of Landsat-8 (OA: 86.63%). (3) The U-Net model performs best on Sentinel-2 images (OA: 92.45%, F1: 90.45%), improving the accuracy by 0.13% compared to DeepLab v3, and provides more accurate boundary delineation. However, DeepLab v3 demonstrates greater adaptability to low-resolution images. This study presents a dune segmentation approach that integrates multi-source data and model optimization, offering a framework for the dynamic monitoring and fine-scale mapping of the desert’s geomorphology.
Suggested Citation
Pengyu Zhao & Jiale An & Jianghua Zheng & Wanqiang Han & Nigela Tuerxun & Bochao Cui & Xuemi Zhao, 2025.
"Segmentation Performance and Mapping of Dunes in Multi-Source Remote Sensing Images Using Deep Learning,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:713-:d:1621289
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:713-:d:1621289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.