IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p711-d1621200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Serviceability of Urban Green Spaces from a Spatial Perspective: A Comparative Study Across 368 Cities on the Chinese Mainland

Author

Listed:
  • Yuetong Qin

    (Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), School of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
    Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Observation of Polar Environment (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Zhuhai 519082, China)

  • Yibin Ma

    (Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), School of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
    Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Observation of Polar Environment (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Zhuhai 519082, China)

  • Mengjie Gong

    (Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), School of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
    Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Observation of Polar Environment (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Zhuhai 519082, China)

  • Shaodong Li

    (Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), School of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
    Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Observation of Polar Environment (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Zhuhai 519082, China)

  • Pengfei Chen

    (Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), School of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
    Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Observation of Polar Environment (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Zhuhai 519082, China)

Abstract

Assessing urban green spaces’ (UGSs) serviceability is crucial for ecosystems and well-being, but traditional approaches focus only on the quantity of UGSs while neglecting their spatial configuration or depend on region-specific data sources, significantly limiting their applicability for comprehensive assessments and comparisons of UGSs. To address this problem, we proposed a novel triangular indicator framework for evaluating UGS serviceability from a spatial perspective using public geospatial data. This framework integrated three independent indicators to capture the ecological value and residents’ utilization of UGSs and one composite indicator for the proportion of high-quality UGS services. Our approach was applied across 368 cities in mainland China, and significant geographical differences in UGS provision and usage equality were identified. Cities with similar UGS service characteristics were grouped using clustering, providing tailored improvement suggestions. Lastly, a regression analysis was conducted to compare the proposed indicator system with traditional metrics in relation to economic, demographic, and environmental satisfaction data, highlighting the advantages of our approach and its complementary role alongside traditional ones. This study offers a new method for large-scale UGS evaluation, aiding policymakers in refining UGS distribution, improving environmental equality, and formulating effective planning strategies to promote sustainable urban development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuetong Qin & Yibin Ma & Mengjie Gong & Shaodong Li & Pengfei Chen, 2025. "Investigating the Serviceability of Urban Green Spaces from a Spatial Perspective: A Comparative Study Across 368 Cities on the Chinese Mainland," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:711-:d:1621200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/711/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/711/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:711-:d:1621200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.