Author
Listed:
- Yongping Li
(Faculty of Land Resource Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
Yunnan Institute of Land Resources Planning and Design, Kunming 650216, China
Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing of Yunnan, Kunming 650093, China
Spatial Information Integration Technology of Natural Resources in Universities of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650211, China)
- Xianguang Ma
(Faculty of Land Resource Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
Yunnan Institute of Land Resources Planning and Design, Kunming 650216, China
Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing of Yunnan, Kunming 650093, China
Spatial Information Integration Technology of Natural Resources in Universities of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650211, China)
- Junsan Zhao
(Faculty of Land Resource Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
Spatial Information Integration Technology of Natural Resources in Universities of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650211, China)
- Shuqing Zhang
(Yunnan Institute of Land Resources Planning and Design, Kunming 650216, China
Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing of Yunnan, Kunming 650093, China
Spatial Information Integration Technology of Natural Resources in Universities of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650211, China)
- Chuan Liu
(Faculty of Land Resource Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)
Abstract
Investigating spatio-temporal differentiation patterns of land-use conflicts in mountainous and flatland regions provides critical insights for optimizing spatial regulation strategies and advancing sustainable regional development. Using the Urban Agglomeration in Central Yunnan (UACY) as a case study, the production–living–ecological space (PLES) was classified through land-use functional dominance analysis based on 2010–2020 geospatial datasets. Spatio-temporal evolution patterns and mountain–dam differentiation were analyzed using spatial superposition, dynamic degree analysis, transfer matrices, and geospatial TuPu methods. A multi-scale conflict index incorporating landscape metrics was developed to assess PLES conflict intensities across spatial scales, with contribution indices identifying key conflict-prone spatial types. Analysis revealed distinct regional differentiation in PLES distribution and evolutionary trajectories during 2010–2020. Forest Ecological Space (FES) and Agricultural Production Space (APS) dominated both the entire study area and mountainous zones, with APS exhibiting particular dominance in dam regions. Grassland Ecological Space (GES) and Other Ecological Space (OES) experienced rapid conversion rates, contrasting with stable or gradual expansion trends in other space types. Change intensity was significantly greater in mountainous zones compared to flatland area (FA). PLES conflict exhibited marked spatial heterogeneity. FA demonstrated substantially higher conflict levels than mountainous zones, with evident scale-dependent variations. Maximum conflict intensity occurred at the 4000 m scale, with all spatial scales demonstrating consistent escalation trends during the study period. ULS, FES, and WES predominantly occurred in low-conflict zones characterized by stability, whereas APS, Industrial and Mining Production Space (IMPS), RLS, GES, and OES were primarily associated with high-conflict areas, constituting principal conflict sources.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:703-:d:1620685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.