IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p671-d1617936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Tenure Governance in the First Decades of the 21st Century: Progress, Challenges, and Lessons from 18 Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Marc Wegerif

    (Development Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Pretoria, Hatfield 0028, South Africa)

  • Mohamed Coulibaly

    (Faculty of Public Law, Kurukanfuga University of Bamako, Bamako BP E2528, Mali)

  • Hubert Ouedraogo

    (Independent Consultant, Ouagadougou BP 6082, Burkina Faso)

Abstract

This article is based on a review of the governance of land tenure in 18 countries—16 in Africa and 2 in Asia—carried out from 2021 to 2023. It uses international guidelines on land policy and tenure governance as benchmarks to assess progress in each country through reviewing policy documents and literature, and obtaining inputs from key informants. This paper shows that, during the last decade, there has been significant progress in land tenure policies that have improved the recognition of customary and other communal land rights and improved women’s land rights. The formal registration of individual rights to customary and community land has now been achieved cost-effectively, with more rights going to women in a number of settings, and without leading to widespread commoditisation or land dispossession. There is a mixed picture, with countries trying different ways to grapple with common challenges such as securing customary tenure rights, unlocking development potential, improving women’s land rights, and managing the contesting interests in land. There are important examples of best practices in some countries that can be learnt from, such as the legislation of Free Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) requirements and processes of large-scale land rights registration. Despite progress achieved in several countries, too many people are not enjoying the benefits of improved land tenure security; some countries still need to adopt new legislation, while others need to improve their implementation of existing legislation. More needs to be learnt from the range of different approaches to dealing with land tenure as national governments attempt to find solutions that accommodate contesting interests. The lessons and trends identified will be of value to country-level and international work on improving land tenure governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc Wegerif & Mohamed Coulibaly & Hubert Ouedraogo, 2025. "Land Tenure Governance in the First Decades of the 21st Century: Progress, Challenges, and Lessons from 18 Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:671-:d:1617936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/671/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/671/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:671-:d:1617936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.