IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p622-d1612943.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Farmers’ Perceptions of the Efficacy of Current Climate Risk Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies on Agriculture in The Gambia

Author

Listed:
  • Sheriff Ceesay

    (West African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use (WASCAL), Dakar 22100, Senegal
    Faculty of Economics and Management Sciences (FASEG), Cheikh Anta Diop University (UCAD), Dakar 22100, Senegal
    Directorate of Research and Development, University of Education, The Gambia (UEG), Banjul P.O. Box 1646, The Gambia)

  • Fatima Lambarraa-Lehnhardt

    (Farm Economics and Ecosystem Services, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), 15374 Müncheberg, Germany)

  • Mohamed Ben Omar Ndiaye

    (Faculty of Economics and Management Sciences (FASEG), Cheikh Anta Diop University (UCAD), Dakar 22100, Senegal)

  • Diatou Thiaw

    (Department of Geography, Cheikh Anta Diop University (UCAD), Dakar 22100, Senegal)

  • Mamma Sawaneh

    (School of Agriculture and Environmental Health Sciences, University of The Gambia (UTG), Banjul P.O. Box 1646, The Gambia)

  • Johannes Schuler

    (Farm Economics and Ecosystem Services, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), 15374 Müncheberg, Germany)

Abstract

Agricultural systems face increasing challenges due to climate change, necessitating effective adaptation and mitigation strategies. This study investigates smallholder farmers’ perceptions of the efficacy of these strategies in The Gambia, employing a mixed-method approach that includes a perception index (PI), effectiveness score (ES), importance–performance analysis (IPA), and statistical analysis. A structured survey was conducted among 420 smallholder farmers across three agricultural regions. Farmers rated adaptation and mitigation strategies using a Likert scale, and a PI was developed to quantify their responses. The index was 0.66, indicating a moderate level of perceived effectiveness. Additionally, ES was calculated to assess the performance of various strategies, while IPA categorized strategies based on their adoption and perceived impact. Chi-square tests and factor analysis were applied to explore differences in perceptions. The findings reveal that strategies such as crop diversification, pesticide application, irrigation, and the use of inorganic fertilizers are widely adopted and perceived as effective. The IPA matrix identified key strategies needing improvement, particularly those with high importance but low performance. Barriers to adoption include limited financial resources (77%), lack of government support (64%), and insufficient knowledge (52%), with no significant gender-based differences in perceptions. This study underscores the need for policy interventions that integrate farmers’ perceptions to enhance climate resilience. Targeted investments in adaptive technologies, financial support, and knowledge-sharing platforms can improve adoption and effectiveness. This research provides valuable insights into the interplay between farmer perceptions, adaptation strategies, and agricultural sustainability in The Gambia.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheriff Ceesay & Fatima Lambarraa-Lehnhardt & Mohamed Ben Omar Ndiaye & Diatou Thiaw & Mamma Sawaneh & Johannes Schuler, 2025. "Farmers’ Perceptions of the Efficacy of Current Climate Risk Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies on Agriculture in The Gambia," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:622-:d:1612943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/622/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/622/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:622-:d:1612943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.