Author
Listed:
- Xiaoping Fu
(Ecological Civilization Collaborative Innovation Center, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)
- Fangyan Xue
(Ecological Civilization Collaborative Innovation Center, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)
- Yunan Liu
(Ecological Civilization Collaborative Innovation Center, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
School of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Hainan College of Software Technology, Qionghai 571400, China
Hainan Provincial Engineering Research Center for Spatial Data Application, Hainan College of Software Technology, Qionghai 571400, China)
- Furong Chen
(Department of Construction Economics and Management, Guangzhou Urban Construction Vocational School, Guangzhou 510006, China)
- Hao Yang
(Ecological Civilization Collaborative Innovation Center, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)
Abstract
Urban flood susceptibility has emerged as a critical challenge for cities worldwide, exacerbated by rapid urbanization. This study evaluates urban flood susceptibility under different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) in the context of urbanization. A coupled modeling approach integrating the System Dynamics (SD) model and the Future Land Use Simulation (FLUS) model was employed to project future land use changes under sustainable development, moderate development, and conventional development scenarios. Additionally, an XGBoost model was developed to assess urban flood susceptibility. The results indicate that urban construction land will continue to increase over the next 30 years, with the extent of growth varying across different scenarios. Notably, under the conventional development scenario, rapid economic growth leads to a significant expansion of built-up land and a sharp decline in ecological land, which in turn exacerbates the urban flood susceptibility. Consequently, urban flood susceptibility is projected to increase across all three scenarios, albeit at varying rates. Specifically, under the sustainable development scenario, 27% of Guangzhou is projected to face high flood risk. In the moderate development scenario, the area classified as high-risk increased by 868.73 km 2 . Under the conventional development scenario, the high-risk area expanded from 1282.9 km 2 in 2020 to 2761.33 km 2 , representing a 16% increase. These differences are primarily attributed to changes in land use, which alter surface runoff and subsequently enhance the city’s vulnerability to waterlogging. This study provides a comprehensive framework for assessing urban flood susceptibility in the context of urbanization, offering valuable insights for formulating targeted flood prevention and mitigation strategies.
Suggested Citation
Xiaoping Fu & Fangyan Xue & Yunan Liu & Furong Chen & Hao Yang, 2025.
"Evaluation of Urban Flood Susceptibility Under the Influence of Urbanization Based on Shared Socioeconomic Pathways,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:621-:d:1612826
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:621-:d:1612826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.