IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p604-d1611419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

autoRA: An Algorithm to Automatically Delineate Reference Areas—A Case Study to Map Soil Classes in Bahia, Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Hugo Rodrigues

    (Laboratory of Soil and Water in Agroecosystems (LASA), Postgraduation in Soil Science, Agronomy Institute, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23890-000, Brazil)

  • Marcos Bacis Ceddia

    (Laboratory of Soil and Water in Agroecosystems (LASA), Postgraduation in Soil Science, Agronomy Institute, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23890-000, Brazil
    Agrotechnology and Sustainability Department, Agronomy Institute, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23890-000, Brazil)

  • Gustavo Mattos Vasques

    (Brazilian Research Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation—Soils, Rio de Janeiro 22460-000, Brazil)

  • Sabine Grunwald

    (Pedometrics, Landscape Analysis & GIS Laboratory, Soil, Water, and Ecosystem Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)

  • Ebrahim Babaeian

    (Environmental Soil Physics Lab, Soil, Water, and Ecosystem Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)

  • André Luis Oliveira Villela

    (Technical College of the Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 23897-000, Brazil)

Abstract

The reference area (RA) approach has been frequently used in soil surveying and mapping projects, since it allows for reduced costs. However, a crucial point in using this approach is the choice or delineation of an RA, which can compromise the accuracy of prediction models. In this study, an innovative algorithm that delineates RA (autoRA—automatic reference areas) is presented, and its efficiency is evaluated in Sátiro Dias, Bahia, Brazil. autoRA integrates multiple environmental covariates (e.g., geomorphology, geology, digital elevation models, temperature, precipitation, etc.) using the Gower’s Dissimilarity Index to capture landscape variability more comprehensively. One hundred and two soil profiles were collected under a specialist’s manual delineation to establish baseline mapping soil taxonomy. We tested autoRA coverages ranging from 10% to 50%, comparing them to RA manual delineation and a conventional “Total Area” (TA) approach. Environmental heterogeneity was insufficiently sampled at lower coverages (autoRA at 10–20%), resulting in poor classification accuracy (0.11–0.14). In contrast, larger coverages significantly improved performance: 30% yielded an accuracy of 0.85, while 40% and 50% reached 0.96. Notably, 40% struck the best balance between high accuracy (kappa = 0.65) and minimal redundancy, outperforming RA manual delineation (accuracy = 0.75) and closely matching the best TA outcomes. These findings underscore the advantage of applying an automated, diversity-driven strategy like autoRA before field campaigns, ensuring the representative sampling of critical environmental gradients to improve DSM workflows.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugo Rodrigues & Marcos Bacis Ceddia & Gustavo Mattos Vasques & Sabine Grunwald & Ebrahim Babaeian & André Luis Oliveira Villela, 2025. "autoRA: An Algorithm to Automatically Delineate Reference Areas—A Case Study to Map Soil Classes in Bahia, Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-36, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:604-:d:1611419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/604/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/604/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:604-:d:1611419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.