IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p601-d1611238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of Ecosystem Service Value to LULC Under Multi-Scenario Simulation Considering Policy Spatial Constraints: A Case Study of an Ecological Barrier Region in China

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Zhang

    (Department of Land Resource Management, School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Key Laboratory of Law Evaluation, Ministry of Land and Resources of China, 388 Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Zhanqi Wang

    (Department of Land Resource Management, School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Key Laboratory of Law Evaluation, Ministry of Land and Resources of China, 388 Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Hanwen Du

    (Department of Land Resource Management, School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Key Laboratory of Law Evaluation, Ministry of Land and Resources of China, 388 Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Haiyang Li

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

Analyzing the complex dynamics of land use, accurately assessing ecosystem service values (ESVs), and predicting future trends in land use and ESVs alterations within the spatial constraints of policies are essential for policymaking and advancing sustainable development objectives. This study analyzed land use/land cover (LULC) changes in Yunnan Province from 2005 to 2020. Policy constraints were incorporated into the scenario simulations, and an improved equivalent factor method, Markov-PLUS model, global spatial autocorrelation, and the Getis-Ord Gi* method were applied to predict and analyze LULC and ESVs under different scenarios for 2030. The findings revealed the following: (1) Forests and grasslands were the dominant land use categories in YNP, with notable alterations in land use patterns recorded between 2005 and 2020. (2) The total ESVs in the study area increased by CNY 8.152 billion during this period, exhibiting an initial decline followed by gradual recovery. (3) Simulations for 2030 indicated that the natural development scenario would lead to the most extensive urbanization, while the ecological conservation scenario would yield the greatest increase in total ESVs. In contrast, only the farmland conservation scenario led to an increase in food production-related ESVs, but resulted in the lowest total ESVs among the three scenarios. These results contribute to understanding the impacts of land use changes on ESVs, and provide insights for formulating scientifically sound and effective ecological protection and development policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Zhang & Zhanqi Wang & Hanwen Du & Haiyang Li, 2025. "Response of Ecosystem Service Value to LULC Under Multi-Scenario Simulation Considering Policy Spatial Constraints: A Case Study of an Ecological Barrier Region in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:601-:d:1611238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/601/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/601/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:601-:d:1611238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.