IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p571-d1608216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Forest Carbon Sequestration in China Under Multiple Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Mingli Qiu

    (School of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Yuxin Zhao

    (School of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Dianfeng Liu

    (School of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
    Key Laboratory of Digital Cartography and Land Information Application Engineering, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430079, China
    Hubei Luojia Laboratory, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

Understanding how climate policies impact forest carbon sequestration is crucial for optimizing mitigation strategies. This study evaluated forest carbon sequestration in China from 2020 to 2060 under three climate scenarios: SSP1-2.6 (high mitigation), SSP3-7.0 (limited mitigation), and SSP5-8.5 (no mitigation). We integrated the land-use harmonization (LUH2) and patch-generating land-use simulation (PLUS) models to project forest cover change, and the Lund–Potsdam–Jena managed land (LPJmL) model to simulate carbon dynamics. The results showed stronger mitigation efforts led to higher sequestration, with annual rates of 0.49, 0.48, and 0.20 Pg yr −1 across the scenarios. SSP1-2.6 achieved the highest carbon density (17.75 kg m −2 ) and sequestration (56.95 Pg), driven by the greatest increases in the carbon density of existing forests (+41.56%) and soil carbon (+39.94%). SSP3-7.0, despite the highest forest cover (34.74%), had a lower carbon density (17.19 kg m −2 ) and sequestration (56.84 Pg). SSP5-8.5 recorded the lowest forest cover (27.12%) and sequestration (45.62 Pg). Increasing carbon density, rather than expanding forest area, could be more effective for carbon sequestration in China. The carbon density and annual sequestration in existing forests were 2.36 and 2.89 times higher than in new forests. We recommend prioritizing SSP1-2.6 to maximize sequestration, focusing on protecting southwest forests and soil carbon.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingli Qiu & Yuxin Zhao & Dianfeng Liu, 2025. "Assessing Forest Carbon Sequestration in China Under Multiple Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:571-:d:1608216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/571/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/571/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:571-:d:1608216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.