Author
Listed:
- Dong Dong
(School of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230091, China
Anhui Institute of Territory Spatial Planning and Ecology, Hefei 230091, China)
- Runyu Huang
(School of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230091, China)
- Huanyu Sun
(School of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230091, China)
- Nan Li
(School of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230091, China)
- Xiao Yang
(School of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230091, China)
- Kangkang Gu
(School of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230091, China
Anhui Institute of Territory Spatial Planning and Ecology, Hefei 230091, China)
Abstract
Under the rapid urbanization process, PM 2.5 pollution has become an increasingly critical issue. Changes in land-use types will inevitably affect PM 2.5 concentration. Meanwhile, the problem of imbalance and inadequacy of regional development remains prominent. This study took the Huaihe River Ecological Economic Belt as the research object, integrating the spatial econometric model with the Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression (GTWR) and Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) models, to investigate the spatiotemporal heterogeneity and spillover effect of the association between PM 2.5 concentration and land use from 1998 to 2021. The main findings are as follows: (1) PM 2.5 concentration in the study area from 1998 to 2021 showed an upward and then a downward trend, taking 2013 as a turning point, with respective magnitudes of 50.4% and 42.1%; (2) land use exerts a significant spillover effect on PM 2.5 pollution. Except for grassland and cropland, the direct effect of each land type on PM 2.5 pollution exceeds its indirect effect; (3) the influence of land use on PM 2.5 pollution exhibits significant spatiotemporal variations. The impact coefficient of forests remains relatively consistent across the entire region, whereas that of cropland, water bodies, and impervious surfaces varies markedly across different regions, particularly in the northeastern and southern cities of the study area. The results of this study may give new ideas for collective governance and joint environmental remediation in different cities and probably provide some basis for the formulation of air pollution control policies and urban land planning.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:568-:d:1608062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.