IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p549-d1606208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Traditional Metrics: A Hybrid Framework for Assessing the Ecological Carrying Capacity of Mountainous Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Luo

    (Institute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
    Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-Security, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Jiwei Leng

    (Institute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
    Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-Security, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Daming He

    (Institute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
    Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-Security, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Yanbo Li

    (Institute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
    Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-Security, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Kai Ma

    (Institute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
    Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-Security, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Ziyue Xu

    (Institute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
    Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-Security, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Kaiwen Zhang

    (Institute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
    Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-Security, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Yun Luo

    (Institute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
    Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-Security, Kunming 650500, China)

Abstract

Ecological carrying capacity (ECC) is a crucial indicator for assessing sustainable development capabilities. However, mountain ecosystems possess unique complexities due to their diverse topography, high biodiversity, and fragile ecological environments. Addressing the current shortcomings in mountain ECC assessments, this paper proposes a novel hybrid evaluation framework that integrates improved ecological footprint (EF) and ecosystem service value (ESV) approaches with spatial econometric models. This framework allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the dynamic changes and driving factors of the mountain ecological carrying capacity index (ECCI), using Pingbian County as a case study. The results indicate the following: (1) Land use changes and biodiversity exert varying impacts on the ECCI across different regions. The ECCI decreased by 42% from 2003 to 2021 (from 4.41 to 2.54), exhibiting significant spatial autocorrelation and heterogeneity. (2) The ecological service value coefficient is the main factor increasing the ECCI, while the energy consumption value and per capita consumption value inhibited the increase in the ECCI. For every 1% increase in the ecosystem service value coefficient, the ECCI increased by 0.66%, whereas every 1% increase in energy consumption value and per capita consumption value reduced the ECCI by 0.18% and 0.28%, respectively. (3) The overall spatial distribution pattern of the ECCI is primarily “southwest to northeast”, with the distance of centroid migration expanding over time. Based on these key findings, implementing differentiated land use practices and ecological restoration measures can effectively enhance the mountain ECCI, providing scientific support for the sustainable management of mountain areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Luo & Jiwei Leng & Daming He & Yanbo Li & Kai Ma & Ziyue Xu & Kaiwen Zhang & Yun Luo, 2025. "Improving Traditional Metrics: A Hybrid Framework for Assessing the Ecological Carrying Capacity of Mountainous Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:549-:d:1606208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:549-:d:1606208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.