IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p443-d1595836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of LULC Change Dynamics That Have Occurred in Tuscany (Italy) Since 2007

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo Arcidiaco

    (Institute of BioEconomy, National Research Council (CNR-IBE), CNR Research Area—Building D, Via Madonna Del Piano, 10, 50019 Firenze, Italy)

  • Manuela Corongiu

    (Environmental Monitoring and Modeling Laboratory for the Sustainable Development (Lamma Consortium), c/o CNR Research Area—Building D, Via Madonna Del Piano, 10, 50019 Firenze, Italy)

Abstract

The dynamics of Land Use/Land Cover changes are crucial to environmental sustainability, socio-economic development, and spatial planning. These changes stem from complex interactions between human activities, natural processes, and policies. In recent decades, LULC transformations have been linked to global challenges such as biodiversity loss, climate change, and resource degradation. Key drivers include urban sprawl, agricultural expansion and abandonment, and deforestation, emphasizing the need for effective frameworks to monitor and assess their impacts. This study investigates Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) changes in Tuscany (Italy) over the period from 2007 to 2019. To achieve this, statistical analyses were conducted to quantify variations in LULC across different classes and administrative territories represented by provincial local authorities. Specifically, data spanning five temporal intervals (2007, 2010, 2013, 2016, and 2019) enabled a comprehensive comparative analysis of spatial persistence in LULC patterns. Changes were assessed using a statistical approach based on Odds Ratios (OR). Additionally, Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) at the provincial level were employed to facilitate one-to-many provincial comparisons and to evaluate the statistical significance of observed LULC changes. The analysis revealed that certain classes exhibit a greater susceptibility to changes compared to others. Specifically, the classes categorized under ’Artificial Surfaces’ (LC_100) were, on average, 6.7 times more likely to undergo changes than those classified as ’Agricultural Areas’ (LC_200) and 11 times more likely than those under ’Forest and Semi-natural Areas’ (LC_300). Over time, the areas classified as artificial territories have exhibited a progressively decreasing probability of change. Notably, during the first update period (2007–2010), these areas were 3.5 times more susceptible to change compared to the most recent update period (2016–2019). An additional significant finding emerged from the statistical comparison of LULC changes across administrative regions governed by different authorities (Provinces). These findings underscore the potential of using administrative indicators and morphological parameters to analyze LULC change trends. The proposed approach provides a robust framework for interpreting territorial resilience and informing spatial planning strategies effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Arcidiaco & Manuela Corongiu, 2025. "Analysis of LULC Change Dynamics That Have Occurred in Tuscany (Italy) Since 2007," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-41, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:443-:d:1595836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/443/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/443/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annamaria Felli & Francesco Zullo, 2024. "Legislative Foundations: Exploring Land Take Laws and Urban Regeneration Policies in Italy and Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Astrid Vannoppen & Jeroen Degerickx & Niels Souverijns & Anne Gobin, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Dynamics in Grasslands Using the Landsat Archive," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Luca Salvati & Marco Zitti & Margherita Carlucci, 2014. "Territorial Systems, Regional Disparities and Sustainability: Economic Structure and Soil Degradation in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-19, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Salvati & Agostino Ferrara & Ilaria Tombolini & Roberta Gemmiti & Andrea Colantoni & Luigi Perini, 2015. "Desperately Seeking Sustainability: Urban Shrinkage, Land Consumption and Regional Planning in a Mediterranean Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Salvati, Luca & Carlucci, Margherita, 2015. "Towards sustainability in agro-forest systems? Grazing intensity, soil degradation and the socioeconomic profile of rural communities in Italy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-13.
    3. Luca Salvati & Margherita Carlucci & Giuseppe Venanzoni, 2017. "Recession, resilience, local labour markets: wealthier is better?," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 177-204, July.
    4. Anne Gobin & Inge Uljee, 2025. "European Green Deal Strategies for Agriculture in Dynamic Urbanised Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Yonghan Ju & So Young Sohn, 2017. "Technology Credit Scoring Based on a Quantification Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Rosanna Salvia & Pere Serra & Ilaria Zambon & Massimo Cecchini & Luca Salvati, 2018. "In-Between Sprawl and Neo-Rurality: Sparse Settlements and the Evolution of Socio-Demographic Local Context in a Mediterranean Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Lorena Salazar-Llano & Marti Rosas-Casals & Maria Isabel Ortego, 2019. "An Exploratory Multivariate Statistical Analysis to Assess Urban Diversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-27, July.
    8. Zambon, Ilaria & Benedetti, Anna & Ferrara, Carlotta & Salvati, Luca, 2018. "Soil Matters? A Multivariate Analysis of Socioeconomic Constraints to Urban Expansion in Mediterranean Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 173-183.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:443-:d:1595836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.