Author
Listed:
- Zuopei Zhang
(State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Yunfeng Hu
(State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Batunacun
(College of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010028, China)
Abstract
In traditional studies on grassland degradation drivers, researchers often lacked the flexibility to selectively consider driving factors and quantitatively depict their contributions. Interpretable machine learning offers a solution to these challenges. This study focuses on Inner Mongolia, China, incorporating four categories and sixteen specific driving factors, and employing four machine learning techniques (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM) to investigate regional grassland changes. Using the SHAP approach, contributions of driving factors were quantitatively analyzed. The findings reveal the following: (1) Between 2015 and 2020, Inner Mongolia experienced significant grassland degradation, with an affected area reaching 12.12 thousand square kilometers. (2) Among the machine learning models tested, the LightGBM model exhibited superior prediction accuracy (0.89), capability (0.9), and stability (0.76). (3) Key factors driving grassland changes in Inner Mongolia include variations in rural population, livestock numbers, average temperatures during the growth season, peak temperatures, and proximity to roads. (4) In eastern and western Inner Mongolia, changes in rural population (31.4%) are the primary degradation drivers; in the central region, livestock number changes (41.1%) dominate; and in the southeast, climate changes (19.3%) are paramount. This work exemplifies the robust utility of interpretable machine learning in predicting grassland degradation and offers insights for policymakers and similar ecological regions.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:386-:d:1589697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.