IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i2p344-d1586301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Interplay Between Carbon Storage, Productivity, and Native Tree Density of Agroforestry Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Laurence Alexander

    (School of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK)

  • Sophie Manson

    (School of Law and Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK)

  • Vinni Jain

    (School of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK)

  • I Made Setiawan

    (Bumi Lestari Conservana, Denpasar 80237, Bali, Indonesia)

  • Made Dwi Sadnyana

    (Bumi Lestari Conservana, Denpasar 80237, Bali, Indonesia)

  • Muhammad Syirazi

    (College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA)

  • Zefanya Ajiningrat Wibowo

    (Bumi Lestari Conservana, Denpasar 80237, Bali, Indonesia)

  • Desak Ketut Tristiana Sukmadewi

    (Agrotechnology Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar 80239, Bali, Indonesia)

  • Marco Campera

    (School of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK)

Abstract

Agroforestry has been widely suggested as a tool for storing carbon while also providing other ecosystem services like food and income production. A greater understanding of how carbon storage in agroforestry systems varies, and particularly how it is intertwined with the productivity of these systems, could enable farmers and policymakers to make changes that simultaneously increase carbon storage and alleviate poverty. In this study, we used allometric equations to evaluate the carbon storage in the biomass of two complex agroforestry systems in Bali, Indonesia—rustic where a native tree canopy is still present, and polyculture where all native trees have been removed, and the canopy consists only of cropping trees. We then compared these figures to that of a nearby primary forest and linked carbon storage to productivity for both agroforestry systems. We found that the primary forest (277.96 ± 149.05 Mg C ha −1 ) stored significantly more carbon than either the rustic (144.72 ± 188.14 Mg C ha −1 ) or polyculture (105.12 ± 48.65 Mg C ha −1 ) agroforestry systems, which were not significantly different from each other. We found productivity and carbon storage to be significantly positively correlated with each other within the polyculture system but not within the rustic system. We also found that for the rustic system, an increase in the density of native trees is accompanied by an increase in carbon storage, but no significant change in productivity. Consequently, we conclude that within the rustic system, carbon storage can be increased or maintained at a high value by the preservation and encouragement of large native trees, and that this need not necessarily result in a decrease in productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurence Alexander & Sophie Manson & Vinni Jain & I Made Setiawan & Made Dwi Sadnyana & Muhammad Syirazi & Zefanya Ajiningrat Wibowo & Desak Ketut Tristiana Sukmadewi & Marco Campera, 2025. "The Interplay Between Carbon Storage, Productivity, and Native Tree Density of Agroforestry Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:344-:d:1586301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/344/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/344/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:344-:d:1586301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.