IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i2p287-d1580248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification and Optimization of Ecological Restoration Areas Coupled with Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand in the Northern Shaanxi Loess Plateau

Author

Listed:
  • Yongxiu Sun

    (School of Petroleum and Environmental Engineering, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Yue Ren

    (School of Petroleum and Environmental Engineering, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Shiliang Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Wenxin Chen

    (School of Petroleum and Environmental Engineering, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Yingjie Xu

    (School of Petroleum and Environmental Engineering, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Jingzhi Xu

    (School of Petroleum and Environmental Engineering, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Panpan Dang

    (School of Petroleum and Environmental Engineering, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Zhirui Niu

    (School of Petroleum and Environmental Engineering, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China
    Yan’an Key Laboratory of Agricultural Solid Waste Resource Utilization, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Xiaoling Xu

    (School of Petroleum and Environmental Engineering, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Fangyan Cheng

    (State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China)

Abstract

Ecological restoration is crucial for maintaining national ecological security. Scientific and reasonable identification of key ecological restoration areas is a difficult problem facing the current national spatial planning. This study evaluated ecosystem service (ES) supply, demand, and their spatio-temporal characteristics in the Northern Shaanxi Loess Plateau (NSLP). A coupling coordination degree (CCD) model was applied to study the interactive relationship between ES supply and demand. The improved ant colony optimization (ACO) model was applied to explore the priority areas of ecological restoration. The results showed that ES supply, demand, and balance had significant spatial differences. Higher ES supply areas were distributed in the south, and higher demand areas were located in the central and northern parts. The balance of ecosystem service exhibited a similar increasing trend to the supply of ES from north to south. Temporally, the supply, demand and balance of ES showed distinct time-varying characteristics across different types of services. Total ES supply decreased from 2000 to 2020, while total ES demand and balance first declined and then rose. Moreover, total ES balance showed a significant decreasing trend in 21.22% of regions in the NSLP. Furthermore, the CCD results showed that about 82% of the regions had a disorder status in 2000, while about 90% of the regions had a coordination status from 2010 to 2020. This also implied that the coupling coordination degree in most regions gradually improved from 2000 to 2020. Finally, four ES enhancement priorities were further identified from the perspectives of enhancing ES supply capacity. Ecological restoration prioritization of different ES enhancements showed significant spatial variations, with the top 15% of the ecological restoration area located in the east–central and west–central regions. The top 5% of total ecosystem services can bring 2,470,400 yuan in ecological benefits. This research can offer scientific and theoretical guidance as well as a reference for decision-makers to undertake ecological restoration efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongxiu Sun & Yue Ren & Shiliang Liu & Wenxin Chen & Yingjie Xu & Jingzhi Xu & Panpan Dang & Zhirui Niu & Xiaoling Xu & Fangyan Cheng, 2025. "Identification and Optimization of Ecological Restoration Areas Coupled with Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand in the Northern Shaanxi Loess Plateau," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:287-:d:1580248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/287/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/287/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wątróbski, Jarosław & Jankowski, Jarosław & Ziemba, Paweł & Karczmarczyk, Artur & Zioło, Magdalena, 2019. "Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 107-124.
    2. Jiang, Wei & Wu, Tong & Fu, Bojie, 2021. "The value of ecosystem services in China: A systematic review for twenty years," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    3. Ziyan Li & Libang Ma & Xianfei Chen & Xiang Wang & Jing Bai, 2023. "Zoning and Management of Ecological Restoration from the Perspective of Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand: A Case Study of Yuzhong County in Longzhong Loess Hilly Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Schröter, Matthias & Stumpf, Klara H. & Loos, Jacqueline & van Oudenhoven, Alexander P.E. & Böhnke-Henrichs, Anne & Abson, David J., 2017. "Refocusing ecosystem services towards sustainability," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 35-43.
    5. Posner, Stephen & Getz, Christy & Ricketts, Taylor, 2016. "Evaluating the impact of ecosystem service assessments on decision-makers," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 30-37.
    6. Bryan, Brett A. & Ye, Yanqiong & Zhang, Jia'en & Connor, Jeffery D., 2018. "Land-use change impacts on ecosystem services value: Incorporating the scarcity effects of supply and demand dynamics," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(PA), pages 144-157.
    7. Xin Wen & Jijun Wang & Xiaojia Han & Lihui Ma, 2024. "Where Are the Trade-Offs in Multiple Ecosystem Services in the Process of Ecological Restoration? A Case Study on the Vegetation Restoration Area in the Loess Plateau, Northern Shaanxi," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siqi Liu & Guanqi Huang & Yulu Wei & Zhi Qu, 2022. "Monitoring and Assessing Land Use/Cover Change and Ecosystem Service Value Using Multi-Resolution Remote Sensing Data at Urban Ecological Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Yajing Shao & Xuefeng Yuan & Chaoqun Ma & Ruifang Ma & Zhaoxia Ren, 2020. "Quantifying the Spatial Association between Land Use Change and Ecosystem Services Value: A Case Study in Xi’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Brunet, Lucas & Tuomisaari, Johanna & Lavorel, Sandra & Crouzat, Emilie & Bierry, Adeline & Peltola, Taru & Arpin, Isabelle, 2018. "Actionable knowledge for land use planning: Making ecosystem services operational," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 27-34.
    4. van der Hoff, Richard & Nascimento, Nathália & Fabrício-Neto, Ailton & Jaramillo-Giraldo, Carolina & Ambrosio, Geanderson & Arieira, Julia & Afonso Nobre, Carlos & Rajão, Raoni, 2022. "Policy-oriented ecosystem services research on tropical forests in South America: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    5. Muhammad Riaz & Wojciech Sałabun & Hafiz Muhammad Athar Farid & Nawazish Ali & Jarosław Wątróbski, 2020. "A Robust q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Information Aggregation Using Einstein Operations with Application to Sustainable Energy Planning Decision Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-39, May.
    6. Mengzhu Liu & Leilei Min & Jingjing Zhao & Yanjun Shen & Hongwei Pei & Hongjuan Zhang & Yali Li, 2021. "The Impact of Land Use Change on Water-Related Ecosystem Services in the Bashang Area of Hebei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Egarter Vigl, Lukas & Marsoner, Thomas & Schirpke, Uta & Tscholl, Simon & Candiago, Sebastian & Depellegrin, Daniel, 2021. "A multi-pressure analysis of ecosystem services for conservation planning in the Alps," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    8. Elias G. Carayannis & Luca Dezi & Gianluca Gregori & Ernesto Calo, 2022. "Smart Environments and Techno-centric and Human-Centric Innovations for Industry and Society 5.0: A Quintuple Helix Innovation System View Towards Smart, Sustainable, and Inclusive Solutions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 926-955, June.
    9. José Manuel Cabello & Francisco Ruiz & Blanca Pérez-Gladish, 2021. "An Alternative Aggregation Process for Composite Indexes: An Application to the Heritage Foundation Economic Freedom Index," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(2), pages 443-467, January.
    10. Bartłomiej Kizielewicz & Jarosław Wątróbski & Wojciech Sałabun, 2020. "Identification of Relevant Criteria Set in the MCDA Process—Wind Farm Location Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-40, December.
    11. Agnieszka Konys, 2019. "Green Supplier Selection Criteria: From a Literature Review to a Comprehensive Knowledge Base," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-41, August.
    12. Gohari, Adel & Ahmad, Anuar Bin & Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard & Gohari, Ali & Hasan, Razi & Sholagberu, Abdulkadir Taofeeq, 2022. "Significance of intermodal freight modal choice criteria: MCDM-based decision support models and SP-based modal shift policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 46-60.
    13. Cinzia Colapinto & Raja Jayaraman & Fouad Ben Abdelaziz & Davide La Torre, 2020. "Environmental sustainability and multifaceted development: multi-criteria decision models with applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 405-432, October.
    14. Xianghua Zhang & Lingbo Dong & Yingli Huang & Yanli Xu & Huiyan Qin & Zhenhua Qiao, 2021. "Equilibrium Relationship between Ecosystem Service Supply and Consumption Driven by Economic Development and Ecological Restoration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Martínez, Ricardo & Sánchez-Soriano, Joaquín & Llorca, Natividad, 2022. "Assessments in public procurement procedures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    16. Heink, Ulrich & Jax, Kurt, 2019. "Going Upstream — How the Purpose of a Conceptual Framework for Ecosystem Services Determines Its Structure," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 264-271.
    17. Carolus, Johannes Friedrich & Hanley, Nick & Olsen, Søren Bøye & Pedersen, Søren Marcus, 2018. "A Bottom-up Approach to Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 282-295.
    18. Jacob Ainscough & Jasper O. Kenter & Elaine Azzopardi & A. Meriwether W. Wilson, 2024. "Participant perceptions of different forms of deliberative monetary valuation: Comparing democratic monetary valuation and deliberative democratic monetary valuation in the context of regional marine ," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(2), pages 189-215, April.
    19. Marttunen, Mika & Haara, Arto & Hjerppe, Turo & Kurttila, Mikko & Liesiö, Juuso & Mustajoki, Jyri & Saarikoski, Heli & Tolvanen, Anne, 2023. "Parallel and comparative use of three multicriteria decision support methods in an environmental portfolio problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 842-859.
    20. Kieslich, Marcus & Salles, Jean-Michel, 2021. "Implementation context and science-policy interfaces: Implications for the economic valuation of ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:287-:d:1580248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.