Author
Listed:
- Xinyu Zhang
(Ecological Institute, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environment Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Eco-Process and Function Assessment, Beijing 100012, China
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, China)
- Ping He
(Ecological Institute, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environment Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Eco-Process and Function Assessment, Beijing 100012, China
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, China)
- Jie Xu
(Ecological Institute, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environment Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Eco-Process and Function Assessment, Beijing 100012, China
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, China)
Abstract
Biological soil crusts are important components of dryland ecosystems, showing variations in appearance, morphology, and function across developmental stages. However, the methods for recording biocrust developmental stages have not been simplified and standardized. In this study, three developmental grades for both cyanobacterial crust and moss crust were defined based on visual indicators such as color, thickness, and moss height. A field survey was conducted across three precipitation regions in northern China, during which the developmental grades of cyanobacterial and moss crusts were visually recorded. Key biocrust developmental indicators, including shear strength, penetration resistance, coverage, chlorophyll a content, and bulk density were measured for each grade. The results showed that both cyanobacterial and moss crusts could be effectively classified into three developmental grades based on these indicators, with a 90% concordance between the measured indicators and the defined grading method. This finding validated that the method could accurately reflect biocrust developmental stages while simplifying field recordings. Developmental indicators in various grades of cyanobacterial and moss crusts showed a moderate (30% < CV < 100%) to strong (CV > 100%) variation, highlighting the importance of environmental heterogeneity at the regional scale. Moreover, the grading method proved effective across varying spatial scales, highlighting its broad applicability. However, its validation across the comprehensiveness of target objects and the geographical scope remains limited. Future research should focus on expanding the grading method to include lichen crust, refining it across diverse ecosystems, and exploring the integration of advanced technologies such as hyperspectral imaging and machine learning to automate and improve the classification process. This study provides a simple and effective grading method for visually recording the developmental stages of biological soil crusts, which is useful for ecological research and field applications.
Suggested Citation
Xinyu Zhang & Ping He & Jie Xu, 2025.
"Visual Gradation of Biological Soil Crust Development: A Simple and Effective Recording Method,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:180-:d:1568636
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:180-:d:1568636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.