IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i1p155-d1566185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Capital Intervention Impacts Rural Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Two Suburban Villages near Wuhan

Author

Listed:
  • Yongwei Tang

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Hubei Engineering and Technology Research Center of Urbanization, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yong Zhou

    (Jiangxi Academy of Social Sciences, Nanchang 330077, China)

  • Hui Ci

    (Hangzhou City Planning and Design Academy, Hangzhou 310020, China)

  • Helin Liu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Hubei Engineering and Technology Research Center of Urbanization, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Mei Luo

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Hubei Engineering and Technology Research Center of Urbanization, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Ying Xu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Hubei Engineering and Technology Research Center of Urbanization, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Maomao Zhang

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

Capital plays a crucial role in driving rural sustainable development. Some rural areas have achieved revitalization through capital intervention, while others have experienced failure. It is possible that the purposes of capital intervention initiated by different parties (such as government, enterprises, and individual investors) in rural areas differ, which leads to the divergence of development routes and effectiveness. Yet, the questions of why and how this phenomenon occurs have not been well studied. Based on observation and an in-depth interview conducted in two suburban villages near Wuhan, we have established an analytical framework with which to compare the route and effectiveness of rural developments driven by capital intervention. The results are as follows: (1) The sources of capital and the embedded purposes determine the modes of rural resource reconfiguration and the arrangement of the relevant industrial sectors. The answer to the question of how to allocate capital gains among different interest groups engaged in rural development determines whether a community of shared interests with respect to sustainable rural development can be established and operate effectively. (2) As the profit-making process differs among capital originating from different sources, it is necessary to evaluate this process such that the pursuit of capital gains and its influence upon rural sustainable development can be clarified and coordinated. (3) Throughout the capital intervention process, villagers’ participation is crucial as it is the prerequisite for the establishment of a mutually beneficial win–win relationship between external capital investors and local villagers. This comparative study of the two villages can provide insights into policy formulation for the purpose of rural revitalization in China and other countries in the Global South undergoing rapid urbanization.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongwei Tang & Yong Zhou & Hui Ci & Helin Liu & Mei Luo & Ying Xu & Maomao Zhang, 2025. "How Capital Intervention Impacts Rural Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Two Suburban Villages near Wuhan," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:155-:d:1566185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/155/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/155/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ren Yang & Yuancheng Lin, 2022. "Rural spatial transformation and governance from the perspective of land development rights: A case study of Fenghe village in Guangzhou," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1102-1121, September.
    2. Haoying Li & Jonas Østergaard Nielsen & Rui Chen, 2023. "Rural Entrepreneurship Development in Southwest China: A Spatiotemporal Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Yan Zhou & Chunjui Wei & Yong Zhou, 2022. "How Does Urban Farming Benefit Participants? Two Case Studies of the Garden City Initiative in Taipei," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Shukui Tan & Shangjun Zou & Yi Zhao & Qingsong He & Maomao Zhang, 2024. "Research on the Manifestation and Formation Mechanism of New Characteristics of Land Disputes: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Gorbuntsova, Tatiana & Dobson, Stephen & Palmer, Nicola, 2019. "Diverse geographies of power and spatial production: Tourism industry development in the Yamal Peninsula, Northern Siberia," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 67-79.
    6. Jing Shen & Rung-Jiun Chou & Rong Zhu & Shun-He Chen, 2022. "Experience of Community Resilience in Rural Areas around Heritage Sites in Quanzhou under Transition to a Knowledge Economy," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feifei Yang & Rajenthyran Ayavoo & Norazlin Ab Aziz, 2023. "Exploring Students’ Push and Pull Motivations to Visit Rural Educational Tourism Sites in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Shao-Chuan Zhu & Rung-Jiun Chou, 2025. "Analysing the Resilience of Fortified Settlements from the Perspective of Community Capital: The Case of Pujing Community in the Ancient Acropolis, Yongning, Quanzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, January.
    3. Yujie Sun & Teiji Watanabe, 2021. "Tourism-Related Facility Development in Sagarmatha (Mount Everest) National Park and Buffer Zone, Nepal Himalaya," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Chong Wu & Mengling Yang & Hang Zhang & Yafang Yu, 2023. "Spatial Structure and Evolution of Territorial Function of Rural Areas at Cultural Heritage Sites from the Perspective of Social Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Huang, Xingyu & Xu, Honggang & Li, Xiang (Robert), 2022. "Spatial development of two villages: Bordering, debordering, and rebordering in a community scenic area," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Wenxing Du & Yuxia Wang & Dingyi Qian & Xiao Lyu, 2022. "Process and Eco-Environment Impact of Land Use Function Transition under the Perspective of “Production-Living-Ecological” Spaces—Case of Haikou City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Richard Butler, 2021. "Research on Tourism, Indigenous Peoples and Economic Development: A Missing Component," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Zhuofan Li, 2022. "The Correlation Effects and Mechanisms of Rural Restructuring and Transformation: A Case Study of the Jianghan Plain in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Fengzeng Lin & Yu Shao & Haibo Guo & Ruihong Yan & Chen Wang & Bolun Zhao, 2024. "Carbon Emissions and Intensity of Land Use: A Rural Setting Analysis in Ningde City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-29, May.
    10. Xia Tian & Yinying Cai & Qing Yang & Jin Xie, 2023. "How Do Heterogeneous Land Development Opportunities Affect Rural Household Nonfarm Employment: A Perspective of Spatial Regulation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Yifan Fang & Jing Qiao & Hong Geng, 2024. "Characterization of Rural Spatial Commodification Patterns around Metropolitan Areas and Analysis of Influential Factors: Case Study in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Linzi Zheng & Yongjie Zheng & Zhengbo Fu, 2024. "The Impact of Urban Renewal on Spatial–Temporal Changes in the Human Settlement Environment in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:155-:d:1566185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.