IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i9p1432-d1471364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Ecoregional Conservation Assessment for the Southern Rocky Mountains Ecoregion and Santa Fe Subregion, Wyoming to New Mexico, USA

Author

Listed:
  • Dominick A. DellaSala

    (Wild Heritage, a Project of Earth Island Institute, 2150 Allston Way, Ste 460, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA)

  • Kaia Africanis

    (Wild Heritage, a Project of Earth Island Institute, 2150 Allston Way, Ste 460, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA)

  • Bryant C. Baker

    (Wildland Mapping Institute, Ventura, CA 93006, USA)

  • Marni Koopman

    (Independent Researcher, 1206 Linda Avenue, Ashland, OR 97520, USA)

Abstract

We conducted a multi-scaled Ecoregional Conservation Assessment for the Southern Rockies (~14.5 M ha) and its trailing edge, the Santa Fe Subregion (~2.2 M ha), from Wyoming to New Mexico, USA. We included a representation analysis of Existing Vegetation Types (EVTs), mature and old-growth forests (MOG), and four focal species—Canada lynx ( Lynx canadensis ), North American wolverine ( Gulo gulo luscus ), Mexican spotted owl ( Strix occidentalis lucida ), and northern goshawk ( Accipiter gentilis )—in relation to 30 × 30 and 50 × 50 conservation targets. To integrate conservation targets with wildfire risk reduction to the built environment and climate change planning, we overlaid the location of wildfires and forest treatments in relation to the Wildland–Urban Interface (WUI) and included downscaled climate projections for a lower (RCP4.5) and higher (RCP8.5) emission scenario. Protected areas were highly skewed toward upper-elevation EVTs (most were >50% protected), underrepresented forest types (<30% protected), especially MOG (<22% protected) and riparian areas (~14% protected), and poorly represented habitats (<30%) for at least three of the focal species, especially in the subregion where nearly all the targets underperformed compared to the ecoregion. Most (>73%) forest-thinning treatments over the past decade were >1 km from delineated WUI areas, well beyond the distance at which vegetation management can effectively reduce structure ignition risk (<50 m from structures). Extreme heat, drought, snowpack reductions, altered timing of peak stream flows, increasing wildfires, and potential shifts in the climate, favoring woodlands over conifer forests, may impact forest-dependent species, while declining snowpack may impact wolverines that den at upper elevations. Strategically targeting the built environment for fuel treatments would improve wildfire risk reduction and may allow for expansion of protected areas held up in controversy. Stepped-up protection for roadless areas, adoption of wilderness proposals, and greater protection for MOG and riparian forests are critical for meeting representation targets.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominick A. DellaSala & Kaia Africanis & Bryant C. Baker & Marni Koopman, 2024. "An Ecoregional Conservation Assessment for the Southern Rocky Mountains Ecoregion and Santa Fe Subregion, Wyoming to New Mexico, USA," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1432-:d:1471364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1432/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1432/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1432-:d:1471364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.