IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i8p1281-d1455784.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological and Environmental Risk Warning Framework of Land Use/Cover Change for the Belt and Road Initiative

Author

Listed:
  • Yinjie He

    (Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518057, China)

  • Dafang Wu

    (School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
    Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Shuangcheng Li

    (Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Ping Zhou

    (Guangdong Nanling Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Guangzhou Institute of Geography, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510075, China)

Abstract

Land use/cover change(LUCC) has a significant impact on the ecological environment. Within the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), as the largest cross-spatial cooperation initiative in human history, one of the core issues is how to scientifically and effectively use and manage the land in the region to prevent the destruction of important ecological and environmental resources. In order to reduce impact on the latter, in this study, we used the bivariate choropleth–multiple-criteria decision analysis (BC-MCDA) method based on the connotation of the sustainable development goals to construct an ecological and environmental risk warning framework. We found that in the study area, 10.51% of the land has high ecological and environmental risk and importance, corresponding to conflict zones, which require special attention. Conflict areas are mainly distributed in the Gangetic Plain in India, the plains in central and southern Cambodia, the Indonesian archipelago, and the southern coastal areas of China. Due to the uneven spatial distributions of population and important ecological and environmental resources, the pressure on this type of land use is very high. A share of 8.06% of the land has high risk–low importance, corresponding to economic development zones. Following years of human development, the ecological and environmental value of this type of land is low. A share of 58.75% of the land has low risk and importance, corresponding to wilderness areas. The natural climatic conditions of this type of land are relatively poor, often characterized by a cold climate or water scarcity, and the human interference index is low. A share of 22.68% of the land has low risk–high importance, corresponding to ecological conservation areas, which are the most important areas for ecological function services for humans at present. Finally, we proposed development suggestions for each type of land.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinjie He & Dafang Wu & Shuangcheng Li & Ping Zhou, 2024. "Ecological and Environmental Risk Warning Framework of Land Use/Cover Change for the Belt and Road Initiative," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1281-:d:1455784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1281/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1281/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo Huadong, 2018. "Steps to the digital Silk Road," Nature, Nature, vol. 554(7690), pages 25-27, February.
    2. B. Calka, 2021. "Bivariate choropleth map documenting land cover intensity and population growth in Poland 2006–2018," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 163-169, January.
    3. William F. Laurance & Gopalasamy Reuben Clements & Sean Sloan & Christine S. O’Connell & Nathan D. Mueller & Miriam Goosem & Oscar Venter & David P. Edwards & Ben Phalan & Andrew Balmford & Rodney Van, 2014. "A global strategy for road building," Nature, Nature, vol. 513(7517), pages 229-232, September.
    4. William F. Laurance & Gopalasamy Reuben Clements & Sean Sloan & Christine S. O’Connell & Nathan D. Mueller & Miriam Goosem & Oscar Venter & David P. Edwards & Ben Phalan & Andrew Balmford & Rodney Van, 2014. "Correction: Corrigendum: A global strategy for road building," Nature, Nature, vol. 514(7521), pages 262-262, October.
    5. Fernando Ascensão & Lenore Fahrig & Anthony P. Clevenger & Richard T. Corlett & Jochen A. G. Jaeger & William F. Laurance & Henrique M. Pereira, 2018. "Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(5), pages 206-209, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coenen, Johanna & Newig, Jens & Meyfroidt, Patrick, 2022. "Environmental governance of a Belt and Road project in Montenegro – National agency and external influences," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Felkner, John S. & Lee, Hyun & Shaikh, Sabina & Kolata, Alan & Binford, Michael, 2022. "The interrelated impacts of credit access, market access and forest proximity on livelihood strategies in Cambodia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    3. Noah Kaiser & Christina K. Barstow, 2022. "Rural Transportation Infrastructure in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Review of Impacts, Implications, and Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-48, February.
    4. Ke Wang & Li Wang & Jianjun Zhang, 2024. "Towards a Comprehensive Framework for Regional Transportation Land Demand Forecasting: Empirical Study from Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Andrzej Bochniak & Monika Stoma, 2021. "Estimating the Optimal Location for the Storage of Pellet Surplus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Fatima Mustafa & Saadia Zia & Dr. Umbreen Khizar, 2021. "Impact of Environmental Concerns on Environmental Attitudes among University Employees," iRASD Journal of Economics, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 3(3), pages 251-260, December.
    7. Xiaofan Yang & Qingfu Liu, 2024. "Research Foundation and Hotspot Analysis of Urban Road Ecology—A Bibliometric Study Based on CiteSpace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Weiping Wang & Saini Yang & Jianxi Gao & Fuyu Hu & Wanyi Zhao & H. Eugene Stanley, 2020. "An Integrated Approach for Assessing the Impact of Large‐Scale Future Floods on a Highway Transport System," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(9), pages 1780-1794, September.
    9. Simon P. K. Bowring & Wei Li & Florent Mouillot & Thais M. Rosan & Philippe Ciais, 2024. "Road fragment edges enhance wildfire incidence and intensity, while suppressing global burned area," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Sainchuluu Amarsanaa & Ariuntsetseg Lkhagva & Bolorchuluun Chogsom & Batbileg Bayaraa & Byambasuren Damdin & Bolormaa Tsooj & Javkhlan Nyamjav & Batkhishig Baival & Chantsallkham Jamsranjav, 2022. "Quantifying the Spatial Extent of Roads and Their Effects on the Vegetation in Mongolia’s Gobi Desert," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, May.
    11. Luqi Wang & Xiaolong Xue & Zebin Zhao & Zeyu Wang, 2018. "The Impacts of Transportation Infrastructure on Sustainable Development: Emerging Trends and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, June.
    12. Aguiar, Sebastián & Mastrángelo, Matías E. & Texeira, Marcos & Meyfroidt, Patrick & Volante, José N. & Paruelo, José M., 2022. "Roads and land tenure mediate the effects of precipitation on forest cover change in the Argentine Dry Chaco," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    13. Maria Kuklina & Antonina Savvinova & Viktoria Filippova & Natalia Krasnoshtanova & Viktor Bogdanov & Alla Fedorova & Dmitrii Kobylkin & Andrey Trufanov & Zolzaya Dashdorj, 2022. "Sustainability and Resilience of Indigenous Siberian Communities under the Impact of Transportation Infrastructure Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Yuanyuan Zhu & John Aloysius Zinda & Qin Liu & Yukuan Wang & Bin Fu & Ming Li, 2023. "Accessibility of Primary Schools in Rural Areas and the Impact of Topography: A Case Study in Nanjiang County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Miner, Patrick & Smith, Barbara M. & Jani, Anant & McNeill, Geraldine & Gathorne-Hardy, Alfred, 2024. "Car harm: A global review of automobility's harm to people and the environment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    16. Sri Astutik & Jürgen Pretzsch & Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi, 2019. "Asian Medicinal Plants’ Production and Utilization Potentials: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-33, October.
    17. Lu, Yangsiyu & Springer, Cecilia & Steffen, Bjarne, 2024. "Cofinancing and infrastructure project outcomes in Chinese lending and overseas development finance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Yuen, Kum Fai & Li, Kevin X., 2020. "Environmental governance of transportation infrastructure under Belt and Road Initiative: A unified framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 189-199.
    19. Li Gao & Fuyou Li, 2023. "China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment and the Environmental Performance of the “Belt and Road Initiative” Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Nechifor, Victor & Basheer, Mohammed & Calzadilla, Alvaro & Obuobie, Emmanuel & Harou, Julien J., 2022. "Financing national scale energy projects in developing countries – An economy-wide evaluation of Ghana's Bui Dam," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1281-:d:1455784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.