IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i8p1265-d1454427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Quality Assessment and Influencing Factors of Different Land Use Types in Red Bed Desertification Regions: A Case Study of Nanxiong, China

Author

Listed:
  • Fengxia Si

    (School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China)

  • Binghui Chen

    (School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Geological Processes & Mineral Resources Survey, Zhuhai 519082, China)

  • Bojun Wang

    (School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China)

  • Wenjun Li

    (School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China)

  • Chunlin Zhu

    (School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China)

  • Jiafang Fu

    (Natural Resources Bureau of Nanxiong City, Nanxiong 512400, China)

  • Bo Yu

    (Guangdong Institute of Environmental Geological Exploration, Guangzhou 510080, China)

  • Guoliang Xu

    (School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

Soil environmental issues in the red bed region are increasingly conspicuous, underscoring the critical importance of assessing soil quality for the region’s sustainable development and ecosystem security. This study examines six distinct land use types of soils—agricultural land (AL), woodland (WL), shrubland (SL), grassland (GL), bare rock land (BRL), and red bed erosion land (REL)—in the Nanxiong Basin of northern Guangdong Province. This area typifies red bed desertification in South China. Principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to establish a minimum data set (MDS) for calculating the soil quality index (SQI), evaluating soil quality, analyzing influencing factors, and providing suggestions for ecological restoration in desertification areas. The study findings indicate that a minimal data set comprising soil organic matter (SOM), pH, available phosphorus (AP), exchangeable calcium (Ca 2+ ), and available copper (A-Cu) is most suitable for evaluating soil quality in the red bed desertification areas of the humid region in South China. Additionally, we emphasize that exchangeable salt ions and available trace elements should be pivotal considerations in assessing soil quality within desertification areas. Regarding comprehensive soil quality indicators across various land use types, the red bed erosion soils exhibited the lowest quality, followed by those in bare rock areas and forest land. Within the minimal data set, Ca 2+ and pH contributed the most to overall soil quality, underscoring the significance of parent rock mineral composition in the red bed desertification areas. Moreover, the combined effects of SOM, A-Cu, and AP on soil quality indicate that anthropogenic land management and use, including fertilization methods and vegetation types, are crucial factors influencing soil quality. Our research holds significant implications for the scientific assessment, application, and enhancement of soil quality in desertification areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Fengxia Si & Binghui Chen & Bojun Wang & Wenjun Li & Chunlin Zhu & Jiafang Fu & Bo Yu & Guoliang Xu, 2024. "Soil Quality Assessment and Influencing Factors of Different Land Use Types in Red Bed Desertification Regions: A Case Study of Nanxiong, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1265-:d:1454427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1265/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1265/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1265-:d:1454427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.