IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i7p923-d1421448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clarification of the Boundaries of Lands of Historical and Cultural Heritage and Determination of Their Protection Zones by Remote Sensing Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Borys Chetverikov

    (Department of Photogrammetry and Geoinformatics, Institute of Geodesy, Lviv Polytechnic National University, S.Bandery Str., 79013 Lviv, Ukraine)

  • Volodymyr Hlotov

    (Department of Photogrammetry and Geoinformatics, Institute of Geodesy, Lviv Polytechnic National University, S.Bandery Str., 79013 Lviv, Ukraine)

  • Krzysztof Bakuła

    (Department of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Systems, Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, Pl. Politechniki 1, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Determining precise boundaries and protective zones for historical and cultural objects enables their effective preservation. This article presents the framework for establishing protective zones around historical and cultural heritage sites existing in Ukraine, using the example of the Citadel defensive complex located in Lviv (Ukraine). It proposes general and detailed conceptual models for the combined application of remote and non-invasive methods for investigating historical and cultural heritage sites. It introduces the theory of integrating radar satellite imaging with ground-based georadar imaging. Additionally, it presents a software module that has been developed to analyze collected data on two-dimensional historical and cultural heritage objects, refine their boundaries, and establish protective zones around them. The result of the work is the determination of extremum points of vertical displacement on the territory of the historical and cultural heritage site “Lviv Citadel” in Ukraine using SAR, and the construction of a map of vertical displacements. A classification of these points was carried out, after which two of them were investigated using GPR for anomalies. Artifacts from World War II were discovered at each of these points. Using the developed software module, updated boundaries of the site were constructed, taking into account the underground artifacts and protective zones.

Suggested Citation

  • Borys Chetverikov & Volodymyr Hlotov & Krzysztof Bakuła, 2024. "Clarification of the Boundaries of Lands of Historical and Cultural Heritage and Determination of Their Protection Zones by Remote Sensing Methods," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:923-:d:1421448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/923/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/923/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Zhou & Fulong Chen & Huadong Guo, 2015. "Differential Radar Interferometry for Structural and Ground Deformation Monitoring: A New Tool for the Conservation and Sustainability of Cultural Heritage Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li-Yen Hsu, 2018. "Interactive Placemaking - Prototype of an Intelligent Urban Building Infrastructure for Critical Borderlands / Kinmen," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(7), pages 128-128, July.
    2. Fengyan Wang & Qing Ding & Lei Zhang & Mingchang Wang & Qing Wang, 2019. "Analysis of Land Surface Deformation in Chagan Lake Region Using TCPInSAR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Cristian Moise & Iulia Dana Negula & Cristina Elena Mihalache & Andi Mihai Lazar & Andreea Luminita Dedulescu & Gabriel Tiberiu Rustoiu & Ioan Constantin Inel & Alexandru Badea, 2021. "Remote Sensing for Cultural Heritage Assessment and Monitoring: The Case Study of Alba Iulia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, January.
    4. Izabela Luiza Pop & Anca Borza & Anuța Buiga & Diana Ighian & Rita Toader, 2019. "Achieving Cultural Sustainability in Museums: A Step Toward Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:923-:d:1421448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.