IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i7p1040-d1432818.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supporting Efficiency Measurement and Tradeoff Optimization Methods of Ecosystem Services on Grain Production

Author

Listed:
  • Baosheng Wang

    (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610299, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yiping Fang

    (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610299, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    China-Pakistan Joint Research Center on Earth Sciences, CAS-HEC, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan)

  • Xueyuan Huang

    (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610299, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Xinjun He

    (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610299, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

Grain production (GP) is inherently dependent on ecosystem services (ESs). However, the increasing grain demand heightens the conflict between ESs and GP. This tension is further fueled by unstable natural, socio-economic, and political factors. To reconcile this issue and promote their mutual growth, quantifying the extent to which ESs support GP is essential. This study is designed to present a scientific method for measuring the impact of ESs on GP, thereby enhancing the objectivity and scientific rigor of strategies for ecological and food security. This study, by deconstructing the functional relationship between ESs and GP, employs the Super-SBM model to analyze the mathematical relationships between them, thereby achieving the quantification of the efficiency of ESs in supporting GP. The findings reveal the following key points: (1) the Super-SBM model offers a viable and scientifically robust approach for quantifying the supporting efficiency of ESs on GP; (2) the supporting efficiency of ESs for GP in 93.94% of the counties in the Hengduan Mountainous Region (HMR) is less than 1, indicating that both the efficiency and capacity of regional ESs to support GP are relatively low; (3) an obvious spatial mismatch in allocation is evident between the provision of ESs and the demands of GP in the HMR, which leading to regional supply–demand imbalance; (4) the slack relationships and quantity between ESs and grain output assessed by the Super-SBM model provide a scientific basis and optimization direction for crafting sustainable development strategies between ESs and GP. Supporting efficiency research, as an exploration of the relationship between ESs and GP in the quantitative dimension, represents a deepening of qualitative research, it serves to enhance the scientific basis for sustainable development decisions in the ecological environment and agricultural production, holding a certain degree of positive significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Baosheng Wang & Yiping Fang & Xueyuan Huang & Xinjun He, 2024. "Supporting Efficiency Measurement and Tradeoff Optimization Methods of Ecosystem Services on Grain Production," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1040-:d:1432818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1040/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1040/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Costanza, Robert & d'Arge, Ralph & de Groot, Rudolf & Farber, Stephen & Grasso, Monica & Hannon, Bruce & Limburg, Karin & Naeem, Shahid & O'Neill, Robert V. & Paruelo, Jose, 1998. "The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 3-15, April.
    2. Lee, Hsuan-Shih, 2022. "Integrating SBM model and Super-SBM model: a one-model approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    3. Li, Ye & Chen, Yiyan, 2021. "Development of an SBM-ML model for the measurement of green total factor productivity: The case of pearl river delta urban agglomeration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    4. Zhang, Ren-Long & Liu, Xiao-Hong, 2021. "Evaluating ecological efficiency of Chinese industrial enterprise," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 679-691.
    5. Aragie, E. & Balié, J. & Morales, C. & Pauw, K., 2023. "Synergies and trade-offs between agricultural export promotion and food security: Evidence from African economies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    7. Lu, Xinhai & Chen, Danling & Kuang, Bing & Zhang, Chaozheng & Cheng, Chen, 2020. "Is high-tech zone a policy trap or a growth drive? Insights from the perspective of urban land use efficiency," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lisha Pan & Hangang Hu & Xin Jing & Yang Chen & Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Yuefei Zhuo & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Impacts of Regional Cooperation on Urban Land-Use Efficiency: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Lv, Chengchao & Song, Jie & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2022. "Can digital finance narrow the regional disparities in the quality of economic growth? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 502-521.
    3. Mengchao Yao & Yihua Zhang, 2021. "Evaluation and Optimization of Urban Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study in Sichuan Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Ruomeng Zhou & Yunsheng Zhang, 2023. "Measurement of Urban Green Total Factor Productivity and Analysis of Its Temporal and Spatial Evolution in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-32, June.
    5. Junqi Wen & Yong Lan & Guoqin Bu, 2024. "Do Innovation and Entrepreneurship Support Policies Promote Urban Green Transformation?—The Mediating Role of Fiscal Technology Expenditure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Zhou, Di & Yin, Xiaoshuo & Xie, Dongchun, 2023. "Local governments’ environmental targets and green total factor productivity in Chinese cities," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Hangang Hu & Lisha Pan & Xin Jing & Guan Li & Yuefei Zhuo & Zhongguo Xu & Yang Chen & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Non-Stationary Effect of Industrial Agglomeration on Urban Land Use Efficiency: A Case Study of Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-27, May.
    8. Nannan Liang & Linlin Zhao, 2024. "An Efficiency and Coupling Analysis of Chinese Regional Economic and Environmental Sustainability Based on a Super-SBM Model and Coupling Coordination Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Can Cheng & Xiuwen Yu & Heng Hu & Zitian Su & Shangfeng Zhang, 2022. "Measurement of China’s Green Total Factor Productivity Introducing Human Capital Composition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Jie Zhang & Yajing Wang & Jiangfeng Li, 2023. "Maximize Eco-Economic Benefits with Minimum Land Resources Input: Evaluation and Evolution of Land Use Eco-Efficiency of Agglomerations in Middle Reaches of Yangtze River, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Xiangyu Hua & Haiping Lv & Xiangrong Jin, 2021. "Research on High-Quality Development Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity of Regional Economies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Sheng Xu & Wenran Pan & Demei Wen, 2023. "Do Carbon Emission Trading Schemes Promote the Green Transition of Enterprises? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    13. Xufeng Cui & Sisi Huang & Cuicui Liu & Tingting Zhou & Ling Shan & Fengyuan Zhang & Min Chen & Fei Li & Walter T. de Vries, 2021. "Applying SBM-GPA Model to Explore Urban Land Use Efficiency Considering Ecological Development in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Chenyang Liu & Lihang Cui & Cuixia Li, 2022. "Impact of Environmental Regulation on the Green Total Factor Productivity of Dairy Farming: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Ning Li & Ruiling Li & Shangshang Yu, 2024. "Managerial Myopia and Enterprise Green Total Factor Productivity: Perspectives on the Supervisory Effect and Incentive Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Dongchu Han & Mianfang Liu, 2022. "How Does the Digital Economy Contribute to Regional Green Development in China? Evidence-Based on the Intermediary Effect of Technological Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Jiyou Xiang & Linfang Tan & Da Gao, 2024. "Unlocking Green Patterns: The Local and Spatial Impacts of Green Finance on Urban Green Total Factor Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Wen-Min Lu & Qian Long Kweh & Chung-Wei Wang, 2021. "Integration and application of rough sets and data envelopment analysis for assessments of the investment trusts industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 163-194, January.
    19. Franz R. Hahn, 2007. "Determinants of Bank Efficiency in Europe. Assessing Bank Performance Across Markets," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 31499, April.
    20. Alperovych, Yan & Hübner, Georges & Lobet, Fabrice, 2015. "How does governmental versus private venture capital backing affect a firm's efficiency? Evidence from Belgium," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 508-525.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1040-:d:1432818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.