IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i7p1040-d1432818.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supporting Efficiency Measurement and Tradeoff Optimization Methods of Ecosystem Services on Grain Production

Author

Listed:
  • Baosheng Wang

    (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610299, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yiping Fang

    (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610299, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    China-Pakistan Joint Research Center on Earth Sciences, CAS-HEC, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan)

  • Xueyuan Huang

    (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610299, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Xinjun He

    (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610299, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

Grain production (GP) is inherently dependent on ecosystem services (ESs). However, the increasing grain demand heightens the conflict between ESs and GP. This tension is further fueled by unstable natural, socio-economic, and political factors. To reconcile this issue and promote their mutual growth, quantifying the extent to which ESs support GP is essential. This study is designed to present a scientific method for measuring the impact of ESs on GP, thereby enhancing the objectivity and scientific rigor of strategies for ecological and food security. This study, by deconstructing the functional relationship between ESs and GP, employs the Super-SBM model to analyze the mathematical relationships between them, thereby achieving the quantification of the efficiency of ESs in supporting GP. The findings reveal the following key points: (1) the Super-SBM model offers a viable and scientifically robust approach for quantifying the supporting efficiency of ESs on GP; (2) the supporting efficiency of ESs for GP in 93.94% of the counties in the Hengduan Mountainous Region (HMR) is less than 1, indicating that both the efficiency and capacity of regional ESs to support GP are relatively low; (3) an obvious spatial mismatch in allocation is evident between the provision of ESs and the demands of GP in the HMR, which leading to regional supply–demand imbalance; (4) the slack relationships and quantity between ESs and grain output assessed by the Super-SBM model provide a scientific basis and optimization direction for crafting sustainable development strategies between ESs and GP. Supporting efficiency research, as an exploration of the relationship between ESs and GP in the quantitative dimension, represents a deepening of qualitative research, it serves to enhance the scientific basis for sustainable development decisions in the ecological environment and agricultural production, holding a certain degree of positive significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Baosheng Wang & Yiping Fang & Xueyuan Huang & Xinjun He, 2024. "Supporting Efficiency Measurement and Tradeoff Optimization Methods of Ecosystem Services on Grain Production," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1040-:d:1432818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1040/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1040/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Costanza, Robert & d'Arge, Ralph & de Groot, Rudolf & Farber, Stephen & Grasso, Monica & Hannon, Bruce & Limburg, Karin & Naeem, Shahid & O'Neill, Robert V. & Paruelo, Jose, 1998. "The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 3-15, April.
    2. Lee, Hsuan-Shih, 2022. "Integrating SBM model and Super-SBM model: a one-model approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    3. Li, Ye & Chen, Yiyan, 2021. "Development of an SBM-ML model for the measurement of green total factor productivity: The case of pearl river delta urban agglomeration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    4. Tone, Kaoru & Toloo, Mehdi & Izadikhah, Mohammad, 2020. "A modified slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 560-571.
    5. Zhang, Ren-Long & Liu, Xiao-Hong, 2021. "Evaluating ecological efficiency of Chinese industrial enterprise," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 679-691.
    6. Aragie, E. & Balié, J. & Morales, C. & Pauw, K., 2023. "Synergies and trade-offs between agricultural export promotion and food security: Evidence from African economies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    7. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    8. Lu, Xinhai & Chen, Danling & Kuang, Bing & Zhang, Chaozheng & Cheng, Chen, 2020. "Is high-tech zone a policy trap or a growth drive? Insights from the perspective of urban land use efficiency," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davtalab-Olyaie, Mostafa & Begen, Mehmet A. & Yang, Zijiang & Asgharian, Masoud, 2024. "Incentivization in centrally managed systems: Inconsistencies resolution," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Zhang Zhang & Huimin Zhou & Shuxian Li & Zhibin Zhao & Junbo Xu & Yuansuo Zhang, 2024. "Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urban Land Use Efficiency in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-27, April.
    3. Lisha Pan & Hangang Hu & Xin Jing & Yang Chen & Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Yuefei Zhuo & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Impacts of Regional Cooperation on Urban Land-Use Efficiency: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Zhen Shi & Huinan Huang & Yingju Wu & Yung-Ho Chiu & Shijiong Qin, 2020. "Climate Change Impacts on Agricultural Production and Crop Disaster Area in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Lv, Chengchao & Song, Jie & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2022. "Can digital finance narrow the regional disparities in the quality of economic growth? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 502-521.
    6. Lai, Aolin & Wang, Qunwei, 2024. "How coal de-capacity policy affects renewable energy development efficiency? Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    7. Mengchao Yao & Yihua Zhang, 2021. "Evaluation and Optimization of Urban Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study in Sichuan Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Ruomeng Zhou & Yunsheng Zhang, 2023. "Measurement of Urban Green Total Factor Productivity and Analysis of Its Temporal and Spatial Evolution in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-32, June.
    9. Lai, Aolin & Li, Zhenran & Hu, Xiurong & Wang, Qunwei, 2024. "Does digital economy improve city-level eco-efficiency in China?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1198-1213.
    10. Junqi Wen & Yong Lan & Guoqin Bu, 2024. "Do Innovation and Entrepreneurship Support Policies Promote Urban Green Transformation?—The Mediating Role of Fiscal Technology Expenditure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, March.
    11. Jiao Hou & Xinhai Lu & Shiman Wu & Shangan Ke & Jia Li, 2022. "Analysis of the Dynamic Relationship between Green Economy Efficiency and Urban Land Development Intensity in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Zhou, Di & Yin, Xiaoshuo & Xie, Dongchun, 2023. "Local governments’ environmental targets and green total factor productivity in Chinese cities," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    13. Hangang Hu & Lisha Pan & Xin Jing & Guan Li & Yuefei Zhuo & Zhongguo Xu & Yang Chen & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Non-Stationary Effect of Industrial Agglomeration on Urban Land Use Efficiency: A Case Study of Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-27, May.
    14. Anyomi, Siegfried Kafui, 2023. "Efficiency: Mutual vs. Stock P-L Insurers," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    15. Nannan Liang & Linlin Zhao, 2024. "An Efficiency and Coupling Analysis of Chinese Regional Economic and Environmental Sustainability Based on a Super-SBM Model and Coupling Coordination Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Can Cheng & Xiuwen Yu & Heng Hu & Zitian Su & Shangfeng Zhang, 2022. "Measurement of China’s Green Total Factor Productivity Introducing Human Capital Composition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Lee, Hsuan-Shih, 2022. "Integrating SBM model and Super-SBM model: a one-model approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    18. Lin, Boqiang & Xie, Yongjing, 2022. "Analysis on operational efficiency and its influencing factors of China’s nuclear power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    19. Zhengyu Zhang & Gui Jin, 2024. "Measurement of Agricultural Eco-Efficiency and Analysis of Its Influencing Factors: Insights from 44 Agricultural Counties in Liaoning Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.
    20. An, Qingxian & Tao, Xiangyang & Xiong, Beibei & Chen, Xiaohong, 2022. "Frontier-based incentive mechanisms for allocating common revenues or fixed costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 294-308.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1040-:d:1432818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.