IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i6p808-d1409831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality Improvement of Urban Public Space from the Perspective of the Flâneur

Author

Listed:
  • Li Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
    School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
    Department of Architecture and Design, Politecnico di Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy)

  • Xiao Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
    School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
    Energy Saving Technology Research Institute, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Hao Zheng

    (Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Luca Caneparo

    (Department of Architecture and Design, Politecnico di Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy)

Abstract

As the quality of public space has become significant for urban development, the creation of high-quality public spaces is becoming increasingly important. Since the implementation of urban renewal policies, an increasing number of buildings have emerged, creating new types of public spaces. Compared to original public spaces, new public spaces are more open, flexible, and diverse. The design of public spaces is closely related to users and the flâneur can precisely serve as a user and observer to conduct in-depth research. So, our study was conducted under the identity of the flâneur , focusing on two cases in Guangzhou. The flâneur completes the data collection through two methods. Static research involves observing and taking photos, whereas dynamic research involves interviews and questionnaires. This study analysed three aspects: the group category, behavioural diversity, and activity time and evaluated the public space using the NPS scale. The study found that the recommendation rate of new urban public spaces is higher than that of original public spaces. The study also found that original public spaces need to be improved in four ways: equipping furniture facilities, improving traffic congestion, increasing blue-green spaces, and establishing artistic spaces. New urban public spaces need to make efforts to create more interactive spaces and increase stagnation points.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Wang & Xiao Liu & Hao Zheng & Luca Caneparo, 2024. "Quality Improvement of Urban Public Space from the Perspective of the Flâneur," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:808-:d:1409831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/808/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/808/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pilar Baquedano Julià & Tiago Miguel Ferreira, 2021. "From single- to multi-hazard vulnerability and risk in Historic Urban Areas: a literature review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 93-128, August.
    2. Catarina De Sousa Silva & Inês Viegas & Τhomas Panagopoulos & Simon Bell, 2018. "Environmental Justice in Accessibility to Green Infrastructure in Two European Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Bingqin Yu & Wenshu Sun & Jiayuan Wu, 2022. "Analysis of Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Recreational Attraction for POS in Urban Communities: A Case Study of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Xin-Chen Hong & Shi Cheng & Jiang Liu & Lian-Huan Guo & Emily Dang & Jia-Bing Wang & Yuning Cheng, 2023. "How Should Soundscape Optimization from Perceived Soundscape Elements in Urban Forests by the Riverside Be Performed?," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Ye Sun & Wei Lu & Peijin Sun, 2021. "Optimization of Walk Score Based on Street Greening—A Case Study of Zhongshan Road in Qingdao," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Wei Feng & Wei Ding & Miaomiao Fei & Yujun Yang & Weihan Zou & Ling Wang & Meng Zhen, 2021. "Effects of traditional block morphology on wind environment at the pedestrian level in cold regions of Xi’an, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 3218-3235, March.
    7. Sara Barron & Sophie Nitoslawski & Kathleen L. Wolf & Angie Woo & Erin Desautels & Stephen R. J. Sheppard, 2019. "Greening Blocks: A Conceptual Typology of Practical Design Interventions to Integrate Health and Climate Resilience Co-Benefits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-21, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neier, Thomas, 2023. "The green divide: A spatial analysis of segregation-based environmental inequality in Vienna," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Richard Smardon, 2020. "Thomas Panagopoulos. Landscape urbanism and green infrastructure," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 208-209, June.
    3. Judith Schröder & Susanne Moebus & Julita Skodra, 2022. "Selected Research Issues of Urban Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-28, May.
    4. Le Zhang & Xueyan Li & Yanlong Guo, 2024. "Research on the Influencing Factors of Spatial Vitality of Night Parks Based on AHP–Entropy Weights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Dragan Vujičić & Nevena Vasiljević & Boris Radić & Andreja Tutundžić & Nevenka Galečić & Dejan Skočajić & Mirjana Ocokoljić, 2024. "Conceptualisation of the Regulatory Framework of Green Infrastructure for Urban Development: Identifying Barriers and Drivers," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, May.
    6. Yihua Sun & Shixian Luo, 2024. "A Study on the Current Situation of Public Service Facilities’ Layout from the Perspective of 15-Minute Communities—Taking Chengdu of Sichuan Province as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Thiago Almeida Vieira & Thomas Panagopoulos, 2020. "Urban Forestry in Brazilian Amazonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Zhang, Zhehao & Wang, Haiming & Fisher, Thomas, 2024. "The development, validation, and application of the campus walk score measurement system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 40-54.
    9. Yefu Chen & Junfeng Jiao, 2022. "Are There Transit Deserts in Europe? A Study Focusing on Four European Cases through Publicly Available Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Marco Cruz-Sandoval & María Isabel Ortego & Elisabet Roca, 2020. "Tree Ecosystem Services, for Everyone? A Compositional Analysis Approach to Assess the Distribution of Urban Trees as an Indicator of Environmental Justice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Sina Razzaghi Asl & Hamil Pearsall, 2022. "How Do Different Modes of Governance Support Ecosystem Services/Disservices in Small-Scale Urban Green Infrastructure? A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Karim Najar & Ola Nylander & William Woxnerud, 2024. "Social Space Ratio: Calculating the Rate of Public Space Activities That Enhance Social Interaction on a Pedestrian Street in Karlstad, Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-46, October.
    13. Kathleen L. Wolf & Sharon T. Lam & Jennifer K. McKeen & Gregory R.A. Richardson & Matilda van den Bosch & Adrina C. Bardekjian, 2020. "Urban Trees and Human Health: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-30, June.
    14. Carolina Prado & Colectivo Salud y Justicia Ambiental & Red de Ciudadanos para el Mejoramiento de las Comunidades, 2021. "Border Environmental Justice PPGIS: Community-Based Mapping and Public Participation in Eastern Tijuana, México," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Yong Jiang & Chunwei Wang & Hongbo Zhao & Dongqi Sun & Zhipeng Shi & Jianhong (Cecilia) Xia, 2022. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Public Fitness Venues in the Main Urban Area of Dalian from the Perspective of Urban Accessibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    16. Johan Colding & Åsa Gren & Stephan Barthel, 2020. "The Incremental Demise of Urban Green Spaces," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, May.
    17. Yi-Ya Hsu & Scott Hawken & Samad Sepasgozar & Zih-Hong Lin, 2022. "Beyond the Backyard: GIS Analysis of Public Green Space Accessibility in Australian Metropolitan Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
    18. Adriana Galderisi & Giada Limongi, 2021. "A Comprehensive Assessment of Exposure and Vulnerabilities in Multi-Hazard Urban Environments: A Key Tool for Risk-Informed Planning Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Karolina Dudzic-Gyurkovich, 2021. "Urban Development and Population Pressure: The Case of Młynówka Królewska Park in Krakow, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, January.
    20. Hanzheng Lin & Jia-Bing Wang & Xuewei Zhang & Fangbing Hu & Jiang Liu & Xin-Chen Hong, 2024. "Historical sensing: the spatial pattern of soundscape occurrences recorded in poems between the Tang and the Qing Dynasties amid urbanization," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-27, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:808-:d:1409831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.