IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i6p748-d1403124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Green Infrastructure for Mitigating Diffuse Agricultural Contaminant Losses

Author

Listed:
  • Yvonne S. Matthews

    (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Gate 10 Silverdale Rd, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand
    Ministry for the Environment, P.O. Box 10362, Wellington 6143, New Zealand)

  • Paula Holland

    (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Gate 10 Silverdale Rd, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand)

  • Fleur E. Matheson

    (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Gate 10 Silverdale Rd, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand)

  • Rupert J. Craggs

    (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Gate 10 Silverdale Rd, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand)

  • Chris C. Tanner

    (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Gate 10 Silverdale Rd, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand)

Abstract

New Zealand’s agricultural sector faces the challenge of maintaining productivity while minimizing impacts on freshwaters. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of various green infrastructure systems designed to reduce diffuse agricultural sediment and nutrient loads. Utilizing a quantitative economic and contaminant reduction modeling approach, we analyze the impacts of five interceptive mitigation systems: riparian grass filter strips, constructed wetlands, woodchip bioreactors, filamentous algal nutrient scrubbers, and detainment bunds. Our approach incorporates Monte Carlo simulations to address uncertainties in costs and performance, integrating hydrological flow paths and contaminant transport dynamics. Mitigation systems are assessed individually and in combination, using a greedy cyclical coordinate descent algorithm to find the optimal combination and scale of a system for a particular landscape. Applying the model to a typical flat pastoral dairy farming landscape, no single system can effectively address all contaminants. However, strategic combinations can align with specific freshwater management goals. In our illustrative catchment, the mean cost to remove the full anthropogenic load is NZD 1195/ha for total nitrogen, NZD 168 for total phosphorus, and NZD 134 for suspended solids, but results will vary considerably for other landscapes. This study underscores the importance of tailored deployment of green infrastructure to enhance water quality and support sustainable agricultural practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Yvonne S. Matthews & Paula Holland & Fleur E. Matheson & Rupert J. Craggs & Chris C. Tanner, 2024. "Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Green Infrastructure for Mitigating Diffuse Agricultural Contaminant Losses," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:748-:d:1403124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/748/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/748/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Levine, Brian & Horne, Dave & Burkitt, Lucy & Tanner, Chris & Sukias, James & Condron, Leo & Paterson, John, 2021. "The ability of detainment bunds to decrease surface runoff leaving pastoral catchments: Investigating a novel approach to agricultural stormwater management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    2. McWilliam, Wendy & Balzarova, Michaela, 2017. "The role of dairy company policies in support of farm green infrastructure in the absence of government stewardship payments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 671-680.
    3. Hariz, Harizah B. & Lawton, Rebecca J. & Craggs, Rupert J., 2023. "Effects of seeding method and single versus mixed species assemblages on the performance of Filamentous Algae Nutrient Scrubbers (FANS) for the treatment of agricultural drainage," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon R. Swaffield & Robert C. Corry & Paul Opdam & Wendy McWilliam & Jørgen Primdahl, 2019. "Connecting business with the agricultural landscape: business strategies for sustainable rural development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1357-1369, November.
    2. Daniel Barros & Luís Nobre & João Bessa & Liliana Leite & Carlos Mota & Fernando Cunha & Raúl Fangueiro, 2024. "Bio-Inspired Eco-Composite Materials Seaweed Waste Integration for Sustainable Structural Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Oliver Weiss & Pia Minixhofer & Nadine Werner & Stefan Riedenbauer & Elisabeth Olesko & Katharina Lübke & Bernhard Scharf & Ulrike Pitha, 2021. "Alternative Engineered Soils and Seed Mixes Used for Seepage Troughs," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Gabriel Medina & Catherine Isley & J. Arbuckle, 2021. "Promoting sustainable agriculture: Iowa stakeholders’ perspectives on the US Farm Bill conservation programs," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 173-194, January.
    5. Silvia Vanino & Valentina Baratella & Tiziana Pirelli & Donato Ferrari & Antonella Di Fonzo & Fabrizio Pucci & Nikolaos P. Nikolaidis & Maria A. Lilli & Zübeyde Albayram Doğan & Tuncay Topdemir & Sami, 2024. "Nature-Based Solutions for Optimizing the Water–Ecosystem–Food Nexus in Mediterranean Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:748-:d:1403124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.