IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i5p683-d1394099.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coupling of Changing Trends in Population and Construction Land in Traditional Rural Areas and Spatial Patterns in Urban–Rural Development, 2016–2021: A Case Study of Heilongjiang Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jia Lin

    (Postdoctoral Research Station of Agricultural and Forestry Economic Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
    School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Guoming Du

    (Postdoctoral Research Station of Agricultural and Forestry Economic Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
    School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Ying Zhang

    (School of Public Management, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

  • Xiaoyang Yu

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

Abstract

Achieving the goal of integrated urban–rural development is to achieve a spatially balanced development of the constituent elements of urban–rural relations in China. Rural populations and land dedicated to construction are the main components of the countryside in traditional agricultural areas; they play an important role in the development of the countryside itself in terms of urban and rural land use and in the formation of urban and rural development patterns. This study analyzes the spatial and temporal changes in rural populations and construction land at the township level, alongside assessing various forms and the extent of coupled development. Herein, we consider the role of urban–rural attractiveness and propose a framework for relationships between urban and rural development based on different forms of coupled development; a model of urban–rural forces is constructed to determine spatial patterns of urban–rural development at the township level that may transpire in the future. Our study shows that the rural population and construction land in the study area are characterized by significant spatial and temporal dynamics, indicating that traditional rural areas are in a process of rapid development and change. The results of our measurements of township-level coupling indicate that there exist four development patterns within urban–rural development: the A-type is most likely to produce new cities or satellite towns in the future and form new urban areas; the B-type is the area most likely to cease and be annexed to other villages or cities to meet building targets; the C-type comprises areas to be focused on in the future to attract populations and strictly control the growth of rural construction land areas (to avoid land transforming into the B-type); and the D-type refers to lands upon which regional township centers may develop in the future, becoming an area devoted to rural revitalization. The A-type and D-type are prioritized for the allocation of construction land, which can be contracted from types B and C. The results of this study have provided important reference for the formulation of population and construction land control policies in accordance with local conditions and the realization of integrated urban and rural development strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia Lin & Guoming Du & Ying Zhang & Xiaoyang Yu, 2024. "Coupling of Changing Trends in Population and Construction Land in Traditional Rural Areas and Spatial Patterns in Urban–Rural Development, 2016–2021: A Case Study of Heilongjiang Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:5:p:683-:d:1394099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/5/683/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/5/683/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kourtit, Karima & Nijkamp, Peter & Wahlström, Marie Hårsman, 2021. "How to make cities the home of people – a ‘soul and body’ analysis of urban attractiveness," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Wang, Chengchao & Gao, Bidan & Weng, Zudeng & Tian, Ying, 2020. "Primary causes of total hamlet abandonment for different types of hamlets in remote mountain areas of China: A case study of Shouning County, Fujian Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Zou, Baoling & Mishra, Ashok K., 2024. "Modernizing Smallholder Agriculture and Achieving Food Security: An Exploration in Machinery Services and Labor Reallocation in China," IZA Discussion Papers 17008, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Meimei Wang & Yongchun Yang & Tao Guo, 2021. "Measurement of Urban–Rural Integration Level in Suburbs and Exurbs of Big Cities Based on Land-Use Change in Inland China: Chengdu," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Chengcheng Wang & Yanfang Liu & Xuesong Kong & Jiwei Li, 2017. "Spatiotemporal Decoupling between Population and Construction Land in Urban and Rural Hubei Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biao Zhang & Dian Shao & Zhonghu Zhang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution Dynamic, Effect and Governance Policy of Construction Land Use in Urban Agglomeration: Case Study of Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-36, May.
    2. Sheng Liu & Ming Bai & Min Yao & Ke Huang, 2021. "Identifying the natural and anthropogenic factors influencing the spatial disparity of population hollowing in traditional villages within a prefecture-level city," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Malin Song & Weiliang Tao, 2022. "Coupling and coordination analysis of China's regional urban‐rural integration and land‐use efficiency," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1384-1413, September.
    4. Tao Xia & Elias G. Carayannis & Stavros Sindakis & Saloome Showkat & Nikos Kanellos, 2024. "Technology transfer for sustainable rural development: evidence from homestead withdrawal with compensation in Chengdu–Chongqing," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 303-333, February.
    5. Worku Nega & Mulugeta Tenaw & Yeneneh Hunie & Sayeh Kassaw Agegnehu & Reinfried Mansberger, 2021. "Evaluating Institutional Dichotomy between Urban and Rural Land Administration in Amhara Region, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Xiaodong Xu & Jingping Liu & Ning Xu & Wei Wang & Hui Yang, 2018. "Quantitative Study on the Evolution Trend and Driving Factors of Typical Rural Spatial Morphology in Southern Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Cayetano Medina-Molina & María de la Sierra Rey-Tienda & Eva María Suárez-Redondo, 2022. "The Transition of Cities towards Innovations in Mobility: Searching for a Global Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Mu Li & Yunyang Shi & Wenkai Duan & Aiqi Chen & Nan Wang & Jinmin Hao, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Decoupling of Population, Economy and Construction Land Changes in Hebei Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Gomez-Vidal, Cristina & Gomez, Anu Manchikanti, 2021. "Invisible and unequal: Unincorporated community status as a structural determinant of health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    10. Karima Kourtit & Bart Neuts & Peter Nijkamp & Marie H. Wahlström, 2021. "A Structural Equation Model for Place-based City Love: An Application to Swedish Cities," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 44(3-4), pages 432-465, May.
    11. Shi, Linna & Wang, Yongsheng, 2021. "Evolution characteristics and driving factors of negative decoupled rural residential land and resident population in the Yellow River Basin," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Yajun Ma & Ping Zhang & Kaixu Zhao & Yong Zhou & Sidong Zhao, 2022. "A Dynamic Performance and Differentiation Management Policy for Urban Construction Land Use Change in Gansu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-31, June.
    13. Zhiheng Yang & Nengneng Shen & Yanbo Qu & Bailin Zhang, 2021. "Association between Rural Land Use Transition and Urban–Rural Integration Development: From 2009 to 2018 Based on County-Level Data in Shandong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    14. Özer İsmet Selçuk & Türk Umut, 2023. "How Does Quality of Life (QOL) Affect Attractiveness of Cities and Internal Migration in Turkey?," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 61(1), pages 85-103, March.
    15. Yingchao Lin & Yongle Li & Zhili Ma, 2018. "Exploring the Interactive Development between Population Urbanization and Land Urbanization: Evidence from Chongqing, China (1998–2016)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-28, May.
    16. Elif Öztürk Aksoy & Pelin Dursun Çebi, 2024. "A Conceptual Exploration of Hidden Spatial Layers: Reading Urban-Breccia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Yaolin Liu & Enxiang Cai & Ying Jing & Jie Gong & Zhengyu Wang, 2018. "Analyzing the Decoupling between Rural-to-Urban Migrants and Urban Land Expansion in Hubei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Ping Zhang & Xiaojuan Yang & Hua Chen & Sidong Zhao, 2023. "Matching Relationship between Urban Service Industry Land Expansion and Economy Growth in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-29, May.
    19. Ziyu Qin & Jia Wang & Yunhan Wang & Lihao Liu & Junye Zhou & Xinyu Fu, 2025. "Assessing the Impacts of New Quality Productivity on Sustainable Agriculture: Structural Mechanisms and Optimization Strategies—Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-47, March.
    20. Lucia Saganeiti & Antonella Favale & Angela Pilogallo & Francesco Scorza & Beniamino Murgante, 2018. "Assessing Urban Fragmentation at Regional Scale Using Sprinkling Indexes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:5:p:683-:d:1394099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.